DG
2016-09-28 15:08:01
- #1
Regarding 1: What do you have in mind there?
With contaminated sites, you assume the hazard; the risk can only be excluded by having the soil examined beforehand or by leaving the risk with the seller. However, the seller will hardly agree to that.
With development contributions, the costs arise when the development is completed. So, if the road is already fully developed, one should check whether the development contributions have already been paid or not.
Otherwise, you usually take over the property free of encumbrances - but that does not mean that all potential risks regarding your question must be known to me. However, the ones mentioned above can be checked.
Regarding 2: Is the building area located in the ground movement zone? There are districts in NRW (e.g. Rhein-Erft-Kreis), which, to my knowledge, are entirely declared as ground movement zones. Whether you actually have to expect that due to mining or similar is another matter. But if the property is located in the movement zone, this will be a standard that one can hardly do without. If it were not mentioned there, the seller would presumably be liable. He is unlikely to want to assume liability.
Best regards Dirk Grafe
With contaminated sites, you assume the hazard; the risk can only be excluded by having the soil examined beforehand or by leaving the risk with the seller. However, the seller will hardly agree to that.
With development contributions, the costs arise when the development is completed. So, if the road is already fully developed, one should check whether the development contributions have already been paid or not.
Otherwise, you usually take over the property free of encumbrances - but that does not mean that all potential risks regarding your question must be known to me. However, the ones mentioned above can be checked.
Regarding 2: Is the building area located in the ground movement zone? There are districts in NRW (e.g. Rhein-Erft-Kreis), which, to my knowledge, are entirely declared as ground movement zones. Whether you actually have to expect that due to mining or similar is another matter. But if the property is located in the movement zone, this will be a standard that one can hardly do without. If it were not mentioned there, the seller would presumably be liable. He is unlikely to want to assume liability.
Best regards Dirk Grafe