Prefab house vs. solid house - Please urgently need advice!!

...the resale value of a prefabricated house is certainly 10-15% lower than that of a comparable solid house.

Not exactly with a Huf house,...but the life cycle is indeed shorter.

...the resale value of a prefabricated house is certainly 10-15% lower than that of a comparable solid house.

Not exactly for a Huf house,...but the life cycle is indeed shorter.

That's true Huf Haus certainly also has a good reputation for good reasons.

Prejudice about resale value?

I once found this point on the homepage of a prefabricated house manufacturer:

The resale value is lower

Nobody knows for sure. If a stone house and a wooden house with the same equipment are built next to each other and both are to be sold after 30 years, then we will know if there is any truth to it. Our customers who want to sell their stone house in order to build with us again consistently report that hardly any prospective buyer asks about the construction method. Either the garden is too large, the living room too small, the street too close, the price too high, etc. But stone or wood?

Start with whatever you want. I found it very interesting.

Well, that doesn't make much sense. There are prefabricated houses that are 30 years old. The problem, I see it more in the fact that more mistakes could be made during the wall construction or that the chipboards still contain formaldehyde. I currently have such a renovation case, an Okal house. It smells very musty, the exterior walls need to be completely renovated up to the load-bearing structure. For the ceilings, the chipboards will be replaced with plasterboard, I hope the interior walls will be okay,... Regards

@ parcus: That problematic substances were used in the building materials of prefabricated houses 30 years ago has probably become known everywhere. That is why such a house is also more difficult to sell. But what about prefabricated houses built today in 30 years, which is what the current building decision of emrahx99 and others is about? No one can predict that. Who knows if some massive construction methods, which are harmless today, might prove to be problematic then? "Nobody knows for sure." I find the perspective of the prefabricated house manufacturer, in my quote, refreshingly interesting!

There has been an EU decision for about 2 weeks that all new buildings from 2021 must meet today's passive house standard. Quote:

Europe's builders must prepare for strict efficiency regulations. From 2021, all new buildings must be constructed fully insulated. The EU bodies agreed on a corresponding law. Buildings, alongside transportation, are among the main emitters of climate-damaging greenhouse gases. Private houses, restaurants, or offices are to be built in the future so that they produce as much energy as they consume. For the first time, industrialized countries are issuing ambitious regulations for buildings with the European Union. Green Party MEP Claude Turmes called the agreement a "breakthrough." Nowhere else in the world are there such building standards, he said after the negotiations. The negotiators of the EU Parliament, the EU Commission, and the Council of Ministers in Brussels had struggled for many months over the requirements. After the now achieved agreement, which still requires formal approval by Parliament and the Council, new buildings are to be equipped with energy-saving modules such as thermal insulation, solar systems, or energy-saving lamps so that their energy consumption amounts to only one tenth of the previous. The regulations apply to private houses from December 31, 2020. New public buildings must already comply with the regulations by the end of 2018.

I am curious how the "massive" builders want to solve this, 17.5 cm exterior walls with 30 cm Styrofoam? In 20 years, the stone house sellers of used properties will lament the resale value.