The bombshell came now with the ventilation system. Instead of the TTL 4.5 ICS TSBC eco, we are being offered a combined unit. The heating and ventilation device THZ 5.5 eco comes with a surcharge of a hefty €21,000.
I cannot understand this additional cost. But since we are bound to the supplier, we cannot obtain any further offers.
Therefore, we will most likely forego the ventilation.
I don’t even understand a word. One device is supposed to be replaced by another model – at whose instigation and for what reason?; at a surcharge that sounds more like a total price based on the order of magnitude. What binds you to the supplier, on the one hand (a proprietary bus system or something like that?), and why is it on the other hand dispensable without replacement?
If an agreed part of a delivery item is “out of stock,” it must be replaced equivalently; the risk of additional costs does not fall on the client side (unless you were responsible for a late order). I can hardly imagine such a contract: “The main object of the contract is delivered as a pig in a poke, alternatively a goat at the price of a rhino or nothing, but a universal pre-installation is excluded”?
I also see the contractor as accountable for how they calculate the surcharge, if and why they expect you to share in it. Just send us all your money, it’s urgent, unfortunately!?
And time is running out a bit as well. The house is to be erected on March 3rd.
Then we are now already at D-Day minus 37. It seems to me you heard the announcements for the final boarding call too late. That you can’t conceive a child in the ninth month should have become common knowledge. Or are today’s homebuyers no longer informed about that?