Kaspatoo
2016-08-31 10:45:20
- #1
I have read the text and in the post from the colleague it says that constant volume flow controls work with membranes. I have now read all the posts again, and in my opinion my questions are still not answered.
Also, you confuse me a bit. You wrote: "Otherwise just get one without constant volume flow control, then you can easily open the window." -> to me that means constant volume flow control is what I need if I also want to open the window.
Later you wrote, referring to opening a window: "With constant volume flow control it works against it, without it doesn't care about it." -> somewhat unclear, but I think you mean that constant volume flow control works against an open window, so it is not so good for window opening?!
Then there was: "But there are controlled residential ventilation systems that can regulate volume flow via the speed of the fan motors - and then you have a constant up and down of the speed. An open window (of course) disrupts the volume flow...." -> you had mentioned constant volume flow control as the opposite of dynamic control, here the dynamic control is bad for window opening, so as the opposite constant control is good for windows?! -> my thought then: maybe you just expressed yourself poorly in the comment.
Now you write again: "Without this technology you have – as I already wrote – no problems, because the ventilation is dumb and just blows continuously." So again different?
I think there are many communication problems here, and it seems to annoy you a bit as can be seen from your choice of words. I think the problem is, you know your stuff, you already have one installed yourself and experience with it. People like me don’t have one and therefore come to the forum.
But maybe you could explain once more (for dummies) which different techniques there are now regarding volume flow control (none, constant control, dynamic control, others) and how they react to a window opened overnight. That would be very helpful and kind.
Also, you confuse me a bit. You wrote: "Otherwise just get one without constant volume flow control, then you can easily open the window." -> to me that means constant volume flow control is what I need if I also want to open the window.
Later you wrote, referring to opening a window: "With constant volume flow control it works against it, without it doesn't care about it." -> somewhat unclear, but I think you mean that constant volume flow control works against an open window, so it is not so good for window opening?!
Then there was: "But there are controlled residential ventilation systems that can regulate volume flow via the speed of the fan motors - and then you have a constant up and down of the speed. An open window (of course) disrupts the volume flow...." -> you had mentioned constant volume flow control as the opposite of dynamic control, here the dynamic control is bad for window opening, so as the opposite constant control is good for windows?! -> my thought then: maybe you just expressed yourself poorly in the comment.
Now you write again: "Without this technology you have – as I already wrote – no problems, because the ventilation is dumb and just blows continuously." So again different?
I think there are many communication problems here, and it seems to annoy you a bit as can be seen from your choice of words. I think the problem is, you know your stuff, you already have one installed yourself and experience with it. People like me don’t have one and therefore come to the forum.
But maybe you could explain once more (for dummies) which different techniques there are now regarding volume flow control (none, constant control, dynamic control, others) and how they react to a window opened overnight. That would be very helpful and kind.