New construction, wood-burning stove, nominal heat output, how now?

  • Erstellt am 2017-11-08 10:08:34

HilfeHilfe

2017-11-09 14:29:10
  • #1
we have had a plastered stove (think with fireclay) built by this insolvent Billigheim company. Think 4k plus the pipe outside again.
 

ypg

2017-11-09 15:08:24
  • #2
Hehe, what could be saved will end up on the chimney sweep’s bill anyway
 

berny

2017-11-09 18:43:44
  • #3
Really: No one, absolutely no one, converts a fireplace to save money! Including the chimney, people easily spend 20K + X on such a thing (not a stove). With that, you could heat for a very, very long time with gas, oil, or electricity. You don’t need it, you want it. Or not. As a Porsche driver you want it – because of the smile on your face after every drive and the tingling in your stomach when accelerating, braking, cornering, and the goosebumps from the sound of the engine; not to save time. On the contrary... you want to sit inside and drive as long as possible... Similar to a pool owner; he doesn’t want to save the entry fees at the public pool, he wants his own pool at home. And just like the fireplace owner, he knows that - monetarily - it will never pay off. It doesn’t have to and shouldn’t! This is about “nice to have.” That a fireplace heated more than four times a year also adds some heat to the house – typically the thing burns exactly when the main heating system has to do most of the work, in winter – is a pleasant side effect. This varies depending on the construction of the house and (fireplace) heating habits. In our last rental apartment, we also had one, which felt like it burned every Saturday and Sunday evening from November to February (no records kept). Madame and I always enjoyed only the beautiful flickering and crackling of the fire and never thought for a second about “saving heating costs.” That’s how it is and there’s no need to start a cost discussion. Whoever wants it, takes it; with or without “savings effect.” By the way, there are people who never light it; it just stands there and looks good. Like a beautiful picture on the wall...
 

Knallkörper

2017-11-09 19:56:10
  • #4
My argument for the stove was: If the [Blockheizkraftwerk (Fernwärme)] ever has an engine failure or the pipeline gets dug up, then we won’t be sitting in the cold.
 

Evolith

2017-11-09 21:13:18
  • #5
That’s how I sold ours too [emoji16]
Besides, underfloor heating is a bit slow, so I can compensate for sudden cold snaps.
 

ypg

2017-11-09 21:18:28
  • #6


That's what I'm saying! But you put it well again in a statement worth reading [emoji2]
 

Similar topics
08.01.2013Air heat pump with fireplace, water-bearing stove, hot water heating26
12.01.2012Geothermal heat pump, solar, and fireplace as heating?15
05.03.2014Gas condensing boiler or LW heat pump for water-bearing fireplace?18
23.02.2015Air-water heat pump with solar thermal and fireplace? Cost/benefit/meaning34
30.08.2015Fireplace with heat recovery10
03.12.2015Combination of air source heat pump and water-carrying fireplace14
30.03.2016Underpressure monitor / Chimney 4 Pa36
16.03.2016Chimney no longer allowed from 01.04.16 in KFW 55?19
18.03.2016brown spots above the fireplace10
15.05.2016Experiences with fireplace with water jacket34
30.06.2016Fireplace for KFW 55 house22
21.03.2017Fireplace and carbon monoxide29
12.12.2017What is the minimum distance between a fireplace and a television?11
22.01.2018Fireplace or stove in the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 for new buildings10
20.02.2018Is an oven and ventilation sensible?31
11.06.2018Is a fireplace still useful in new buildings today - experiences?63
15.11.2018One-sided or double-sided fireplace50
23.11.2021What kind of spark protection is there in front of the fireplace??29
13.02.2024Heat pump is not compatible with a water-bearing fireplace144

Oben