Statics is definitely not included, that comes extra. Fire and sound protection alone should also not cost 1,500€, even if I now assume the energy saving regulation certificate at 500€...
Overall, the costs do not look very promising
... Upon inquiry, the heating was apparently still selected by our heating engineer according to our energy saving regulation certificate...
The certificate is always the rough roadmap, nothing more. Whether the most sensible solution was actually chosen by a structural engineer cannot be judged from a distance. For this, from the point of view of the fundamental determination, an assessment of the actual demand depending on the chosen building substance, the climate location, and the user behavior would be necessary. From this actual demand, one can logically derive, in connection with the respective technical solution for heating, hot water preparation, LtM, the consumption actually to be expected. This consideration alone leads to a reliable assessment of the necessary investments in each case.
The heating engineer can at best use the component geometry and U-values of the components from the certificate, if controlled residential ventilation with/without heat recovery, the determined air volumes according to the air volume plan according to DIN 1946-6 and the concept specified by the certificate (heat generator etc.) for his calculations!
... and I am doing a separate heating load calculation...
The heating load calculation according to DIN 12831 alone is not sufficient, especially if condensing boilers, heat pumps, or pellet stoves were considered as heat generators.
Modern heating systems can be very efficient, but only if a complete and comprehensive sizing/calculation of
all components is available. This includes, among other things, the heating surfaces and, for example, the system hydraulics.
However, this is not necessary for an open campfire!
It is now known that building owners are being taken advantage of in general contractor projects regarding the system technology. This should not be suspected in the more expensive independent architectural planning. Apparently, here the "quick money" is being made at the expense of the building owner.
v.g.