Dr. Hix, I notice you have a firm opinion in your "it's not worth it." Yes, there is indeed a difference between self-use and a rental property.
In Galdreth's project, it is about his financial existence and possibly his marriage. For me, it is a project that "only" involves a chunk of money, which might not improve my small pension. I do not have the pressure that Galdreth has, but I also cannot afford a failure.
Times are currently changing, if you think, "if the tenant saves on heating costs, then it doesn't pay off for the landlord." That may still be financially true at the moment, but I think over the next few years property owners will have to pay the CO² tax. I decided on geothermal energy in 2011 when building new – the subsidy had just been cut – yet I would still make the same decision today.
What is the reward? Reward is not only cash but also security, creditworthiness, credit possibility even during macroeconomic changes, and joy in ownership. I believe there are enough users in the forum who look back at their completed construction projects with pride after an "insane time."
I mean, selling brings me nothing if I cannot safely invest the money at 2 - 3% interest – and making a small fortune on the stock market from a large one – that’s not my thing.
I first need money in 5-6 years because of retirement, so it lies in the savings account. But I would have to sell now – that is clear.
By the way, there is no cap on rent increases for new rentals in tenancy law, but an 8% limit on the energy renovation costs, which of course are not realizable! The rent with 2 x 750 euros is more than realistic, even apartments are more expensive here. So I pay off a bit over 5 - 6 years with income that I wouldn't have if I sold, and the house still belongs to me. While the money lies under your mattress, I could pay off the loan. Afterwards, I would have a renovated house, which would have cost me an additional 50K of my already declared special repayment. A two-family house with a value over 500K with the option of sale or rental – where I prefer the latter and pass it on to the next generation. One can certainly assume security and value retention/inflation protection of the property. The already declared tax depreciation of 11,000 euros p.a. over 5 years is, as you say, "six of one, half a dozen of the other," for me cold hard cash, and with it, I finance my vacation once a year.
I will stay away from the project if the costs are too high and/or I cannot find companies that can also implement it timely. I will stop if someone convinces me that the effort is too great and simply nonsense, and that one should then think about a new building right away. Energy consultants from the greater Essen area are hereby encouraged to contact me, advise me, and possibly accompany the measure.
Mr. Hix, I find it okay if you see it differently, but then you could be a bit more concrete than just saying "sell it and then it’s fine."
Or keep the house as it is and only fix the heating and be annoyed for another 25 years with repairs and CO² tax, and deal with tenants who rightly complain about the windows, poor building fabric, and heating costs?