@Parcus
the depicted building envelope.
From inside to outside: 1.0 cm gypsum interior plaster, 36.5 cm aerated concrete, and 2.5 cm minimum exterior plaster; alternatively and cost-neutral: 1.0 cm gypsum interior plaster, 17.5 cm hollow brick, 10.0 cm ETICS, as well as 1.5 cm synthetic resin plaster. Both variants have a U-value of 0.23 W/m²K.[/QUOTE]
Ignoring the HVAC for now.
Overall construction of all windows with triple glazing U-value 1.1 (measured over
everything and not just the glass, as is often the case in competitions), technology: air-water heat pump with integrated domestic hot water supply and 300 l hot water storage tank
The calculated annual primary energy demand QP amounts to 55.15 kWh/(m2 a) and thus meets the minimum requirement of at most 70% of the calculated maximum value for the reference building according to Table 1 of Annex 1 of the Energy Saving Ordinance 2009 of 89.24 kWh/(m2 a). Furthermore, the transmission heat loss HT’ related to the thermally relevant envelope surface amounts to 0.26 W/(m2 K). At the same time, the maximum value of the transmission heat loss HT’ specified in Table 2 of Annex 1 of the Energy Saving Ordinance 2009 of 0.45 W/(m2 K) [I](please enter value) is not exceeded.[/I]
There are also only a few who can really plan and implement cleanly with aerated concrete or Poroton.
We have been working with this material for over 22 years; I may assume my colleagues are experienced.
Much requires special solutions, which also have their price.
That may apply to the small contractor with limited purchasing options, although I have already experienced the occasional unpleasant surprise regarding the calculated number in offers in this area; it appears that for the small contractor the thickness of his order book determines the final price. I have come across competitive offers from such calculating contractors that were sometimes up to EUR 30,000 below my offer with allegedly the same or even better equipment. +/- EUR 5,000–10,000 is normal with comparable equipment.
Thermal bridges are created far too quickly, or the load capacity limit is reached.
There are manufacturer-related thermal bridge catalogs for that ;) However, I am convinced that our specialists have the proper training. And a structural engineer—based on all experience—does not simply sign off on incomplete calculations.
Also, there is no masonry through which cracks can form more quickly.
Mostly due to rigid or erroneously executed connections = defect. How apt that possible cracks remain hidden behind ETICS facades ;) I have worked with Liapor, sand-lime brick, hollow brick, and aerated concrete and do not know a single-family house that did not develop hairline cracks.
Kind regards