Replica
2020-02-18 11:59:22
- #1
With the proposal to approach the municipality about the 4 meter extended Eichendorffstraße, this idea already occurred to me when the separation of the community of heirs was still a speculation.
I would be interested to know what you think (regardless of the personalities involved in this story and the difficult financing) about the following line of thought:
Let's assume the community of heirs remains together for a few more years for tax reasons. But we want to start building a house now.
What if the municipality agreed to the 4 meter street and the community of heirs leases us plot 947 in the meadow (heritable building right), so that we can build a house there.
In a few years, the community of heirs separates, so that the mother-in-law becomes the sole owner of the meadow plots. Then the mother-in-law automatically becomes our sole lessor?
My wife is an only child. The mother-in-law will eventually inherit or prematurely gift her the plot. Then my wife would be our lessor and the land and house would be reunited?
Is this feasible at all? Can all of this be regulated contractually or is it all too risky?
I would be interested to know what you think (regardless of the personalities involved in this story and the difficult financing) about the following line of thought:
Let's assume the community of heirs remains together for a few more years for tax reasons. But we want to start building a house now.
What if the municipality agreed to the 4 meter street and the community of heirs leases us plot 947 in the meadow (heritable building right), so that we can build a house there.
In a few years, the community of heirs separates, so that the mother-in-law becomes the sole owner of the meadow plots. Then the mother-in-law automatically becomes our sole lessor?
My wife is an only child. The mother-in-law will eventually inherit or prematurely gift her the plot. Then my wife would be our lessor and the land and house would be reunited?
Is this feasible at all? Can all of this be regulated contractually or is it all too risky?