Schachliebe
2025-07-17 20:55:11
- #1
Parental allowance is 67% of the net income of the 12 months before birth, maximum 1,800 EUR. Parental allowance is subject to the progression clause, i.e. it is added to the taxable income as wage replacement income in the tax return to determine a new, higher tax rate, with which the taxable income is then taxed.
Then both full-time? Have fun, you are imagining it very simply with a 1-year-old. Should the toddler go to daycare for 10 hours daily? That only works where it is absolutely necessary for financial reasons.
For the second child, the parental allowance is lower because one has gone part-time. And with 2 children 2 years apart, you can completely forget about full-time.
My opinion. If you plan with this income that both kids have to be in daycare, preschool, or school/after-school care for 8-10 hours daily... you better not build a house or build a much smaller one. I am definitely a big supporter of children going to such facilities and meeting other children for 6, 7 hours... but please not 8-10 hours daily so that it can be a villa instead of a normal house.
Parental allowance is 65% and not 67% of the previous net income.
For the second child, under our circumstances it is easily possible to receive the full parental allowance rate again.
Who said anything about both 100%? It is stated several times in my comments that a reduction of working hours is planned or that 150% joint working time is calculated. And with these 150%, including child benefits (and upcoming fixed step increases), we reach just about 7k net.
Overall, I just do not understand where the harsh criticism (which is also based on incorrect assumptions) comes from.