Material exterior walls and interior walls (KfW 55 standard)

  • Erstellt am 2021-08-13 14:16:52

Nida35a

2021-08-14 15:01:22
  • #1
We got to know the Liaplan stone at a trade fair. We also had an idea of our floor plan and the special features of the plot. After the factory tour in Brandenburg, we asked which companies build with the product. We discussed the plans with 3 companies, a family business worked really well, a large one refused because it was too special, and the third made a defensive offer. Now we live in the house and did everything right. Find a contractor with whom the chemistry is right and let them build with their building material.
 

11ant

2021-08-14 15:31:40
  • #2

I did deliberately skip that question - right now, about 40 km diagonally across, various houses have sunk and been washed away before they could be inherited - so you don’t need to worry about eight hundred years with one stone versus nine hundred with the other without a flood disaster - half-timbered houses often stand for twelve hundred years.

You definitely cannot build with KS without external thermal insulation composite systems (ETICS) due to the energy saving ordinance, so at this point we’re back to the crucial question of how you want to handle the religion. Within the monolithic spectrum, I consider the world manageable. Only with the unfilled porous bricks do I least like to disagree with the "hate preachers" :)


You can score unforgettable own goals if you pressure the builder to deal with an unfamiliar stone. Likewise, I would never try to convert a builder, neither away from ETICS nor towards it. The same applies to interior walls between masonry and lightweight construction.

Ceterum censeo, castle wall thicknesses are foolishness. Anyone who sees wall construction as a simple rule of three, assuming everything can be monolithic, and then wants ninety-three-centimeter concrete walls after the oracle pronouncement of their U-value calculator, in my opinion, has missed more than one shot.
 

Baumeister86

2021-08-15 22:07:56
  • #3


Thanks, then the first offers were not that far off after all. Off-topic here: I read in another thread that you had to demolish before building? Could you roughly tell me what you demolished and what you ended up with? Because we have to remove 64 sqm spread over 1.5 floors + partial basement..
 

motorradsilke

2021-08-16 06:20:00
  • #4
We had our old house demolished. That was about 80 sqm plus a small basement of about 8 sqm. However, we gutted it ourselves because doors, windows, and roofing (sheet metal) are still used by my sons for sheds and animal shelters. For the demolition of the remaining masonry and backfilling, we paid about 20,000 euros. We could have done it cheaper (14,000), but we wanted the builder who is also building the house to do it. On the one hand, because it was about seamless sequencing for us (we have to be finished as quickly as possible because we now live only in a container on the property), on the other hand, because in case of any problems (cracks etc. in the masonry), no one can blame the other.
 

Acof1978

2021-08-16 07:37:44
  • #5
But that will be a standard equipment, right? Either without major extras or standard construction at Town & Country or Heinz von Heiden? With a gas condensing boiler, without photovoltaics and controlled residential ventilation, as well as a fireplace and other frills, it would land around 2,200 - 2,300 €. If it should then be a city villa and not a bungalow, we would be at your price.
 

motorradsilke

2021-08-16 07:44:47
  • #6
With a small local builder. Bungalow, heat pump, chimney for the fireplace, electric shutters, no controlled residential ventilation, no photovoltaics, no KNX. We will install the fireplace ourselves.
 

Similar topics
22.05.2017New build bungalow - air-water heat pump, photovoltaic and solar thermal?17
20.08.2018Town & Country Flair Floor Plan Changes24
15.05.2021Town & Country Raumwunder 100 with few changes20
12.11.2021Floor plan of new rectangular bungalow with 130m² living area71

Oben