Mandatory heating rental in new buildings - is that possible?

  • Erstellt am 2022-11-17 11:23:51

MayrCh

2022-11-17 17:18:45
  • #1
Most municipal utilities have to cross-subsidize other things (public transport, swimming pools...) with the revenues from energy sales and network charges, and not just a little. If there are any profits left at all, they go to the shareholders, usually the respective municipality/city.
 

Tolentino

2022-11-17 17:57:05
  • #2
Yes, I know that well and I can imagine how one comes to that conclusion, but I consider it wrong. Taxes or fees are there for the other things.
 

Maulwurfbau

2022-11-29 10:30:06
  • #3
Additional info.

No, the costs do not include the entire development costs. They exclusively cover the cost contribution for the installation of the geothermal collectors (20k€) and the connection to the network of these collectors in the residential area (5k€).

The system technology is provided at the costs stated in the first post. As mentioned, for the pure 25k€ to be able to participate in this heat supply at all, you could equip an entire single-family house with complete heating and hot water technology including underfloor heating on all floors. I mean completely. Of course, the pure costs for heat are then certainly somewhat higher in comparison. But hey, I currently live in a house with KFW 55 standard and an air-water heat pump. Heat (heating and hot water) cost me around 900€ per year with 4 people in the household (2 adults, 2 small children). In the possible new home, it would be significantly more in the next 15 years, but significantly. After that as well, actually. I just can't get behind the concept, where the advantages for me lie apart from handing over responsibility for my heating, which for me personally is more of a disadvantage to become so dependent. Right now, I only see advantages for the local utility company.
 

Maulwurfbau

2022-11-29 10:48:06
  • #4
Oh, I forgot, that was also a question here. The heating costs of currently ~ 8 cents / kwh are not fixed for the duration...
 

WilderSueden

2022-11-29 10:55:20
  • #5
With the additional information, nothing changes about the problem that you have no choice. Either you take the property with the [Nahwärmezwang] or you leave it. It's annoying, but there's nothing we can do about it.
 

Maulwurfbau

2022-11-29 11:14:45
  • #6

I definitely won’t do it, but I still find it interesting to exchange views on such serious topics.
It may be that for some it is such a digital decision. For some, it is certainly the case that they put their own desire for a house above everything else and practically let themselves be “fooled” wherever possible just to live in their own house. Everyone has their reasons.
At least for me, it was important to talk about it.
 

Similar topics
06.08.2015Photovoltaics for hot water26
25.01.2016Hot water only with heat pump?10
16.03.2017Long waiting time until hot water arrives17
06.06.2017Gas heating new building - Is solar thermal necessary for hot water?52
06.02.2018Solar for hot water/heating or better photovoltaic for electricity?21
04.05.2018No hot water is coming in the shower anymore...13
28.07.2018Solar thermal and pellet heating, heating support / hot water16
13.07.2019It takes a long time for hot water to come27
20.11.2019A circulation pump for hot water. Yes or No?41
24.08.2020Garden shower with warm water or without12
20.08.2021Hot water 60 degrees due to Legionella risk12
15.11.2022Tecalor 8.5 Air-Water Heat Pump: Warm water - not hot in the morning21
15.04.2023Interpretation of new heating and hot water system for a 1970 holiday home13
20.09.2023Convert hot water from solar thermal system to photovoltaic system?12

Oben