Land purchase through a bidding process - What is the final price?

... oh... the property belongs to the church?! OK...

On the one hand I understand you, on the other hand I have never heard you raise an outcry when it comes to municipalities only selling plots to "natives." In my eyes, that is just as discriminatory.

But you didn’t have to provide proof that you are a Christian. Our neighbors are atheists and got a plot. For example, I am a Christian but not a Catholic, because for me the church is nothing more than a company and has nothing to do with my faith...

Sorry - that may apply in some areas, but certainly not to land & soil - or most things in construction. Just take a look at the general price development vs. that in the real estate sector. A "normal" price is funny – do you pay an Eigenmietwert to Father State? Do you then push your "fair" share beyond property tax and other charges that you earned through cheap prices 10 years ago? From today's perspective, you basically ripped people off.. Auction procedures as a guarantee of a fair price – of course. We do that everywhere, and there is never behind it a price maximization strategy with a psychological component. The consequence will simply be that increasingly larger parts of the population will no longer be in the race. As a reminder – your own four walls is pretty much the only thing that existed as a "founding myth" of the Federal Republic of Germany: Work hard, learn something sensible, and you can afford a nice little house later.

There is no right to anything – whoever hasn’t understood that by now in Hong Kong, America under Trump & Corona will be surprised in the coming decades. But you can tax, balance, and shape. Your thinking is that of a controller. Will society (or a company) get far with that? The next question would be where the mentioned revenues come from – probably those "special" people do not buy more than others at Aldi either. By the way, real estate transfer tax is a state tax. Property tax as a municipal tax is also not linked to income and the value of the land+house. Why a lending library should be kept for a wealthy upper class (which you have described there), I don’t know either. If anything, in your thinking, one should probably charge 10-20 euros per month there instead of subsidized 10 per year. It just depends on the address.
Daycare – also funny – the educator then lives somewhere in the basement apartment of this new district in the village so that the influencer sales mom can zoom off in the E-Mini? Or, more likely – just doesn’t come anymore because she can work and live better elsewhere for the same money. The power mom just has to see where she stays (at home)..

I actually find the idea of a gated community of the "rich" with a triple down effect on the village quite funny. When the PowerPoint engineer or the polished shoe hero is then drafted into the volunteer fire department, of course especially..

I still do not consider revenue maximization of municipalities and corresponding "land management" to be a sensible development and see a big fault line coming to society, which already has more than is actually good.

In labor law there is compensation for that – does that also apply to civil law?

Not in churches - and by the way, not in unions either (google >> Tendenzbetrieb).