I would doubt that the quality is the same between Keramag and this other brand.
I know it from another manufacturer, where even between the individual series there are differences in the quality of the material. This was told to me by an engineer in my circle of acquaintances who worked for a while at one of the big companies (not Keramag!). The high-quality series are of course all the same, but in the mid-priced and "cheap" series, inferior materials (not necessarily bad, but simply not the same standard as the premium products) are used – and in the mid-priced series, it is again somewhat different than in the cheap series. There was something about thicknesses, etc. – I did not remember everything. Just this much: just because it is from manufacturer xy, it does not mean it is the quality of xy. There are different qualities under the same label in different series, and this is not necessarily obvious to the end consumer at first glance. Maybe after years, or maybe not. And no, it was not about the coating. That is something additional (or not) at the end.
Just like an ALNO kitchen is not simply an ALNO kitchen. Just as an example. There are dozens of different fronts. The basic qualities are certainly comparable, but a printed foil is something else than real glass. You can install hinged doors everywhere or drawers. Or motor-operated, automatic drawers. All ALNO. You can install an oven from 1995 in terms of quality or a modern steam oven/microwave/oven combination device with self-cleaning. Everything is possible in an ALNO kitchen.
And if you want, there is nothing against an Allia product in the end. But to assume that you get something comparable to a Keramag product is rather wishful thinking. It doesn’t have to be. And in authorities, schools, or daycare centers, I have never noticed high-quality toilets, just to say that. But: it doesn’t have to be.