Hyponex
2022-02-13 17:51:43
- #1
I don't understand your calculation. The paid amount goes into the housing promotion account. So 23,000€. That is compounded annually at 2% until retirement. Assuming a period of 30 years until retirement, that rounds up to 42,000€. How do you get to 100,000€?
The 100,000€ is just a pure example calculation, because you can nicely derive the numbers from it.
So the assumption would be: he only takes the 23,000€ (withdrawn from the building society) and then does nothing else with the contract... then he would probably have to repay it at some point, until then 2% would be added to it annually.
I take over your 42,000€, if he repays it in 20 years, then 42,000€ would be taxable on the fictitious housing promotion account.
BUT how does the actual offer look, that would interest me? He probably didn’t make a housing Riester contract with 23,000€ where he pays in the max amount of 2,100€ annually including subsidies, right? It is probably a 100,000€ building savings contract (or 50,000€, but very unlikely given the savings performance) into which 2,100€ flow annually, which is credited to the housing promotion account.
Therefore my calculation moves into this area: the building society pays him the 23,000€ + pre-finances the rest (example 100,000€). For the 23,000€ we are at 42,000€ in 30 years! (I don’t verify this... too much effort, just for the example calculation...) He continues to save the building savings contract to make it ready for allocation with the max amount of 2,100€ (which comes from his savings performance + state subsidies). THUS every year another 2,100€ is added, which then grows the promotion account further with 29 years/2%, then 28 years/2% and so on.
When the building savings contract is ready for allocation, 2,100€ still flows in as housing Riester... as repayment for the remaining loan...
So it could become considerably more.
Of course, he can also withdraw the 23,000€ and only count that amount as housing Riester account. BUT if he has taken out a 50,000€ or even 100,000€ building savings contract, then he has paid quite a lot in fees for that (something between 500€ and 1,600€) and that could also be considered as “costs” for the financing... apart from the annual costs.
And one more thing: If you already have housing Riester, then simply canceling and using the capital for the property (repaying the subsidy / additional taxation) makes absolutely no sense. Then clearly withdraw and only take the amount as housing Riester.
BUT what else you can do: if you realize that you can get cheaper conditions from the bank / wherever anyway without the housing Riester, then you have the following options: - You let it continue to take the subsidies, it might become interesting in the future = meaning if interest rates rise, you might still take the loan through the building society because it is cheaper (basically for follow-up financing!) - Of course, nowadays you can make other contracts and transfer the Riester (harmless for tax/subsidy) to another contract. But you have to calculate exactly what makes the most sense.
PS. I am not an insurance broker, i.e. I do not offer Riester contracts etc.!