Sure, the banks always argue in a way that sounds great to us customers. Of course, you have a tax advantage with the Wohn-Riester and naturally you can achieve a fixed interest rate over years with a long-term building savings contract. But it must also be clear that you don’t get anything for free. Because through the additional building savings contract, part of the bank’s risk is shifted to the building society and the tax advantage must then be repaid monthly upon entering retirement age. The risk minimization should make it clear why the banks argue this way. In addition, the building savings contract brings the bank a bonus. Even if, as with our Sparkasse (I specifically asked), the individual employee does not get a bonus for concluding a contract, all employees have a success-dependent bonus in prospect at the end of the year if revenue x is reached. So indirectly there is still an attempt to conclude extra contracts, etc... Unfortunately, we can’t avoid the banks because anyone who wants to build nowadays needs a lot of capital. And the banks are still making a killing when you consider how cheaply they can get money themselves at the moment.