11ant
2020-11-12 15:27:02
- #1
I am a big fan of old buildings, [...] I also don’t know how sentimental the value of the house is here. You also still have dad in there, who is surely supposed to stay there during the construction phase, right?
“Old building” is politely put “a big word” for a post-war little house, whose “older construction section” I consider steeped in sentiment. You won’t be able to simply demolish that; you will have to say goodbye to it with dignity. With a campfire where grandpa can tell stories of hard times. But the idea that you could carefully tape a whole extension around the senior would be an illusion. A temporary home for half a year will be the minimum.
I am also for demolition and new construction.
However, without father / separate apartment.
Perhaps it is easier to first renovate only part of it until dad is no longer around (which by no means is to say that this is desirable, it is just a consideration meant to be value-neutral) and then tackle the whole thing afterwards?
The father has already been hinted at as having beginning support needs that are no longer in the future – so I don’t see any “long delay” for the need to act. But shifting straight from construction stress – especially with own labor – into (in-law) family caregiving would be a trial (which the OP’s sister has likely avoided for good reason). Especially in a subsequently house size where one’s own children will be “waiting” spatially to inherit grandpa’s room. I see it as making all parties happier to look for solutions outside the seemingly most obvious spectrum.
It’s quite possible that you can still make something out of it using the existing building fabric, which often saves costs overall and is also better for the environment.
I consider classifying this property as still a “foundation” / “half the rent” a textbook Pyrrhic victory. Gently demolishing the roof structure is not hindered by the alternative of new construction.