House purchase - split the price 50/50

  • Erstellt am 2019-05-06 13:41:51

ypg

2019-05-06 23:39:58
  • #1
Land registry is land registry and financing is financing. Two different things. It goes 50/50 into the land registry and finances the loan together. Your wife provides equity, you do not, and that should be regulated by a private contract, e.g. through a private loan. She can give you an interest-free loan for half of her equity, which is to be repaid by you in case of separation. Then, each of you normally pays off half of the bank loan. You should think about the worst-case scenario beforehand. What if... who takes over the house or who can and wants to at all. That can be settled fairly. But everything should actually be regulated according to the above option.
 

TR188

2019-05-07 12:03:25
  • #2


Well, I already have her statement that they want to sell in 2020. So we still have some time to agree on the financial aspects. I found out that they paid 90,000 DM for half back then (2000). Afterwards, they did quite a bit, probably doubling the living space by converting the attic. I'm really curious what price they will ask for.

My current favorite would be financing with both names included, she contributes her share as equity and I pay the loan.
So, many thanks for the suggestions already, they have helped me a lot.
 

Snowy36

2019-05-07 16:30:18
  • #3
But unfortunately that also means if he moves out and stops paying the loan, the bank will come to you and want its money.
 

Müllerin

2019-05-07 17:17:31
  • #4


I was and am aware of that
 

hampshire

2019-05-07 18:36:57
  • #5
The real crucial question is whether one tends to think more in terms of opportunities or risks. Both attitudes have their justification and both have their own pitfalls. From this arise the preferences for a joint financing. The risk observer tends to find the opportunity thinker "romantic-naive-naïve." The opportunity thinker tends to find the risk thinker "dry-cynical-pessimistic." The very clever ones define their own thinking as "rational" – and that in a completely irrational negation of the limited scope of their horizon. What should I advise you as an unwavering optimist and "opportunity thinker"?
 

Silent010

2019-05-10 08:26:43
  • #6
You write in the original post that she is your "wife." So you are married? Then why a separation of the funds for the house?
 

Similar topics
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
21.08.2014Is financing without equity realistic?19
27.10.2014Fixed interest rate financing without equity?20
16.02.2015Financing with equity15
21.02.2015Impacts on loan when equity is in property17
18.03.2015Buying property feasible - Loan with building savings as equity?12
18.12.2015Financing unequal equity ratios of unmarried partners24
15.09.2016Financing without equity with security?52
21.04.2016Is financing with land and equity possible like this?20
14.05.2016House purchase: Financing (with/without equity)24
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
26.07.2016Calculation of equity capital in connection with KfW loan28
28.01.2019Financing - which construction financing is sensible?69
29.05.2021Enough equity? Will we even get a loan?30
10.11.20202 (dream) properties - financing unclear. Save equity?40
31.12.2020Land purchase with varied financing - is it sensible to hold back equity?10
26.06.2021How much equity is needed for home purchase financing?15
01.07.2021Financing / Equity / Granny Flat - Fundamental Thoughts48
11.06.2022Use of Credit vs. Equity41

Oben