Bauexperte
2015-04-17 10:11:59
- #1
Hello,
I completely agree with you; what really annoys me is the one-sided perspective! Similar to choosing stones, there is no silver bullet in the area of heat generators either. I hold the position that both sides of the coin must be considered; that is the sole reason I am expressing myself on this topic.
I am, for example, firmly convinced that in the medium term we will all heat with electricity (have to); the exciting question is how this electricity is produced
Rhine greetings
If you go by that, you would have to build a passive house. Electricity is not exactly ecological either, and the production of heating systems is certainly not ecological at all... But sure, topics like fracking etc. are not so great and speak against gas.
I completely agree with you; what really annoys me is the one-sided perspective! Similar to choosing stones, there is no silver bullet in the area of heat generators either. I hold the position that both sides of the coin must be considered; that is the sole reason I am expressing myself on this topic.
But economically speaking, the acquisition costs for gas (or partly still for an air heat pump) are the cheapest. And even if, for example, you have 300 euros more heating costs per year, that is still "only" 6,000 euros extra over 20 years. And I would say, for example, that a ground source heat pump with trench collectors easily costs over 6,000 more than a gas boiler.
I am, for example, firmly convinced that in the medium term we will all heat with electricity (have to); the exciting question is how this electricity is produced
Rhine greetings