I especially find it important to shorten the term while keeping the rate the same. The shorter the term, the less interest. That is still the best security, because nobody really knows how interest rates will ultimately develop. For example, I expect interest rates to continue falling, even if only minimally. We also financed back in 2012, and almost everyone then said, "5 years fixed interest? Way too risky, rates can't go any lower." But they did, by a solid half a percent. That's quite a lot!
Rearranging the construction financing every 5 years is certainly work, but in my opinion, it is worth it mainly because of the constant reevaluation. For example: if I finance 100k Euros as 100% financing at 2.5% interest and 2% repayment, after 5 years I have a remaining debt of 87k Euros. That means I can refinance with a 90% financing after 5 years, thus benefiting from the better interest rate offered to me. With a 15-year fixed interest, I also pay for a 100% financing for the full 15 years, and at the higher interest rate. A current example would be 2.07% for 5 years, but 3.32% for 15. That's even 1.25% more! On 100k, that amounts to roughly 6000 Euros extra in the first 5 years.
After 5 years, with 90% financing, I currently pay 1.6%, while with a 15-year fixed interest, I still have to pay 3.32%. That is already double the interest rate.
If I add 2 special repayments of 5% each within the first 5-year fixed term, the remaining debt in the above example even drops to around 76k Euros (rough estimate). In the second 5-year term, the 70% loan-to-value limit is reached, and with another 2 special repayments, I even manage 50%. Then, at the beginning of the third term, i.e. after 10 years, only 1.27% or 1.22% interest is payable, while the one with the 15-year fixed interest still pays 3.32%.
You can now exactly calculate the saved interest; to be honest, I am too lazy right now, but I think it is clear that it adds up nicely. Interest rates would have to rise sharply over the next 15 years to cancel out this advantage (then you'd still break even), or even catch up.
If you make the effort to calculate what special repayments make, then (at least for me) a kind of sporty ambition develops to repay as much as possible on the side. With a "secure" 15-year term, you tend to be lulled into a false sense of security, happy not to have to worry about fixed interest terms, follow-up financing, and loan-to-value limits for a while, and pay the high price. Special repayments then tend to happen more rarely because everything is "set and done" for now. That is of course comfortable but ultimately expensive and uneconomical. I observe this with the "one more generation," meaning parents and relatives. They all have contracts with the same insurance. That convenience is well charged; for example, my father-in-law pays double for his car insurance even though his no-claims discount is significantly higher than ours.
With all this, I do not want to criticize anyone who prefers a 15-year fixed interest period. As I said, everyone has to decide that for themselves. It is also a fact that interest rates for construction financing have only moved in one direction over the last 30 years: downwards. Yes, the line is full of spikes, and some also point upwards, but only to fall even further afterward. It would take a completely different global economic situation for interest rates to trend upwards again. I consider that unlikely. And if you actually catch an upward spike, you can switch to a variable financing temporarily and wait for the next low in interest rates.