1950s house with poor substance and damp basement. Floor area 10*11
I would first clarify why it is damp before I start digging there again.
You can’t quote me with that now
Where there is a Willy, there is also a way.
Only the room program was specified. Maybe it came across differently in the questionnaire.
Indeed, it says:
Which corresponding wishes were implemented by the architect?, separated parents' and children's area,
... and that is how it was done, probably in the least diligent way I described.
We love the dressing room and bathroom in this size.
Explicitly with a botched layout and an unnecessary 7.77 sqm sub-hall?
Room program and building volume are fixed and taken into account.
No, neither: the cards absolutely have not yet been shuffled, regarding the basement neither its existence nor its size are fixed.
There was no preliminary draft from our side.
I don’t suspect you of that, but the "architects".
Regarding the stairs: How would you plan them? It was important for us to take the view of the vineyards towards the north. Floor height. On the ground floor it is about 3 m, so according to the architect, a straight staircase would be difficult.
I would not take a staircase 1:1 into a design extended by a whole story; one more step doesn’t mean you couldn’t use what is called a "landing staircase" in the forum. I know that 40 years ago spindle stairs were considered fancy even in larger single-family houses.
Ideas for the stove location?
No, but you caught me – I forgot a wink remark last night: "a wing, a wing! – Mother, the mountain is a hill!" (loosely after Loriot).