HE-DA-DHH
2024-11-23 15:40:53
- #1
Development plan/Restrictions
Size of the plot: approx. 250 sqm
Slope: no
Floor area ratio: 0.3 (already exceeded but approved)
Floor space index 0.7
Building window, building line, and boundary defined by existing structures
Edge development: yes
Number of parking spaces: 1-2
Number of storeys: 2
Roof shape: flat roof possible
Style direction: defined by existing structures
Orientation: north/south
Maximum heights/limits: unknown
Further specifications
Requirements of the builders
Style direction, roof shape, building type
Basement, storeys: modern, flat roof, single-family house, no, 2
Number of persons, age 6, 35, 35, 1, 4, 5, 11
Space requirements on ground floor, upper floor yes
Office: family use or home office?
Overnight guests per year not necessarily required
Open or closed architecture
Conservative or modern construction method
Open kitchen, kitchen island yes
Number of dining seats 6-8
Fireplace yes
Music/stereo wall no
Balcony, roof terrace yes roof terrace 100 sqm
Garage, carport no
Utility garden, greenhouse possibly on roof terrace
Further wishes/special features/daily routine, gladly also reasons why this or that should or should not be
House design
Who is the planner:
- Planner from a construction company no
- Architect yes
- Do-it-yourself yes
What do you particularly like? Why?
What do you not like? Why?
Price estimate according to architect/planner: unknown
Personal price limit for the house, incl. equipment: €500k
Preferred heating technology: fiber optic electric heating in clay panels plus basic stove.
If you have to do without, which details/expansions
- can you do without: high tech, garden
- can you not do without:
Why has the design turned out as it is now? For example
Standard design from the planner?
Corresponding/which wishes were implemented by the architect?
A mixture of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes?
Just some constructive ideas and improvements.
Please understand that we have to make compromises here and that we do things that do not conform to dogma.
The plans should generally be understood rather as a study.
Size of the plot: approx. 250 sqm
Slope: no
Floor area ratio: 0.3 (already exceeded but approved)
Floor space index 0.7
Building window, building line, and boundary defined by existing structures
Edge development: yes
Number of parking spaces: 1-2
Number of storeys: 2
Roof shape: flat roof possible
Style direction: defined by existing structures
Orientation: north/south
Maximum heights/limits: unknown
Further specifications
Requirements of the builders
Style direction, roof shape, building type
Basement, storeys: modern, flat roof, single-family house, no, 2
Number of persons, age 6, 35, 35, 1, 4, 5, 11
Space requirements on ground floor, upper floor yes
Office: family use or home office?
Overnight guests per year not necessarily required
Open or closed architecture
Conservative or modern construction method
Open kitchen, kitchen island yes
Number of dining seats 6-8
Fireplace yes
Music/stereo wall no
Balcony, roof terrace yes roof terrace 100 sqm
Garage, carport no
Utility garden, greenhouse possibly on roof terrace
Further wishes/special features/daily routine, gladly also reasons why this or that should or should not be
House design
Who is the planner:
- Planner from a construction company no
- Architect yes
- Do-it-yourself yes
What do you particularly like? Why?
What do you not like? Why?
Price estimate according to architect/planner: unknown
Personal price limit for the house, incl. equipment: €500k
Preferred heating technology: fiber optic electric heating in clay panels plus basic stove.
If you have to do without, which details/expansions
- can you do without: high tech, garden
- can you not do without:
Why has the design turned out as it is now? For example
Standard design from the planner?
Corresponding/which wishes were implemented by the architect?
A mixture of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes?
Just some constructive ideas and improvements.
Please understand that we have to make compromises here and that we do things that do not conform to dogma.
The plans should generally be understood rather as a study.