ypg
2024-12-09 00:44:16
- #1
Ok, you can imagine it a bit better now. But let me burst the bubble about the non-realistic furnishing. Kitchen: on 3 meters width you can fit 5 tall cabinets, not 7 as drawn, however, at the door to the pantry and the corner there remain just 2 1/2 real tall cabinet widths. 5.30 minus the 1.80 leaves 3.50. Tall cabinets are subtracted from the 1.80. That leaves 5 1/2 kitchen cabinets for workspace and storage, including stove and sink. How many tall cabinets are actually usable? Top left none, door to the pantry none either. The island can be at most 1.50. You have a basement. Either you use it accordingly or not. I see no living space there at the moment. It remains a basement-basement. I see absolutely no advantage in taking away space and usage from a kitchen as well as turning the bathroom into a utility bathroom. I think the upper floor is absolutely blocked. Why don’t you extend the upper right corner outwards and make the terrace a covered terrace? There are no more load-bearing walls from this floor up either, right? [ATTACH alt="IMG_1387.jpeg"]89225[/ATTACH] My tip: explicitly draw in your furniture to scale. Then you can see the shortcomings. Do without the pantry and laundry room in the basement and upper floor. Plan reasonable rooms that are optimally rectangular. Give the kids the upper floor and take the attic as parents.
What are your wishes? There’s somehow nothing in there. Storage? You have the basement, that’s enough storage.What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes? Good: wishes were taken into account. But: is there optimization regarding storage?
The planner (you can’t really call them an architect, I basically only see DIY) should draw in the requested sanitary products. And the waste and vent pipes as well. It can’t be that the client has to think for themselves how everything can be causally planned with drainage.Are the bathrooms big enough?