Financing single-family home - land available

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-10 22:19:11

5erBande

2021-04-11 11:42:55
  • #1
My problem? I actually believe in the feeling that nothing can go wrong. Don’t you know that? Can you all manage your financing with only one salary? I don’t see that with us. It would certainly work for a few months, but in the long term, I wouldn’t want to restrict myself like that.
At the moment, I calculate all additional costs, cleaning lady, and living expenses with expenditures of about 3,000 EUR without savings rate. That would be our current standard of living. Certainly reducible in the short term as well, but in the long term I don’t wish that and also don’t believe we would come under 2,500 EUR in the long run. In addition, there are desired savings rates for vacation, retirement, children, car, etc.
In the transition period between the beginning of external care for K3 and the start of the second year of life (then the daycare here is free or only meal money is charged) about 400 EUR in care costs are added. Without a second income, that is not affordable for us.
I always have in mind that financing has to be manageable with one salary.

Income with K3 would be:
Life month 1 - 3 of K3: 6,900 EUR + company car
Life month 4 - 9 of K3: 5,600 EUR + company car
Life month 10 - 16 of K3: 5,800 EUR - company car installment of 300 EUR, which my husband has to pay himself during the [EZ].
 

Maschi33

2021-04-11 11:49:14
  • #2

Luxury little problem, I would say.

I still don’t understand the question, seriously. Who else in Germany should be able to build a single-family house with a total volume of 700k-800k, if not families with such conditions:

    [*]Huge plot half given away
    [*]Almost 7k household net income in "part-time" – excl. 5(!)-figure bonuses p.a.
    [*]Cash > 100k

Especially since the family only needs a 575k loan. So come on, people, really.
 

askforafriend

2021-04-11 11:55:54
  • #3


I always calculate with a 5% annuity - regardless of the interest rate. 5% annuity and 1.3% interest means 3.7% repayment. BTW: Do you know the term "house rich but life poor?"
 

Maschi33

2021-04-11 12:03:41
  • #4


Honestly, what are 16 months compared to 30+ years of repayment? A drop in the bucket. The times when such projects could be carried by the broad masses with one income are long gone, if they ever were possible at all. I assume you’re certainly not building somewhere in the Hunsrück either.

It’s best if you browse through the forum a bit. Then you’ll see how relaxed your situation is compared to 80% of the Harakiri financings here in the forum dealing with similar sums. :)
 

guckuck2

2021-04-11 12:11:00
  • #5


Describe the situation that would take away this worry of yours. Every partner earning €5000 net, then you would be reassured? Well, then you will probably never own property. Or if you did have €5000 twice, you would probably buy a more expensive house and the dilemma would start all over again.

By the way, we "have to" pay for the house with one salary, simply because we have two very different professions that lead to a very large salary difference. If it weren't for my salary, we could go on welfare, to put it plainly. And? Everyone has their role/focus in this game. You can't escape the responsibility, the risk. You are in the nice position of having leeway. Both have well-paid jobs that could be supplemented. You can also reduce the vacation savings rate sometimes, hiring cleaning help is also a luxury, there are often levers to find with the car as well. Plenty of screws to turn very quickly if things get tight.
 

5erBande

2021-04-11 12:19:23
  • #6
I know it as House rich but cash poor. It can actually happen to us. Especially if only one person is working. Or just short-term during parental leave. Although I would honestly say that with 2 salaries as before and 3 children with a rate of 2000 EUR and thus 4,900 EUR cash for living and saving, I would not consider that cash poor. That would be quite exaggerated. My problem, as already described, is more the thought of something going wrong, for example one person becoming unemployed and the whole thing not being able to be carried by one person.

And a flat 5% annuity also seems a bit short-sighted to me. 3% repayment is often considered healthy. How high a healthy annuity then is depends on the individual interest rate. And it probably won't be 2%. Although I would already find it problematic if a worst-case 400 EUR higher rate would break our neck. Then the structure would probably be too tight. And I am exactly afraid of contingencies like follow-up financing or similar.
 

Similar topics
20.05.2013Question: 1% repayment and 10 years fixed interest rate. Will the house never be paid off?13
23.08.2013Financing existing property - Attention beginners ;-)13
19.11.2014Financing single-family house - How much can we afford?47
14.11.2013Is financing for construction projects feasible?10
22.04.2014Appointment at a well-known bank and problems with financing17
17.07.2015Uncertain due to financing43
16.06.2015Is financing sensible/feasible?10
11.08.2015What can I realistically afford as a rate?51
06.01.2016Construction Financing - What Installment Amount to Choose in Financing?23
18.01.2016Financing - where is the mistake?33
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
20.06.2016Experiences with income from self-employed individuals in financing?12
08.08.2016Financing of construction projects45
17.01.2017Is financing feasible? Finished house for the money?60
07.02.2017Evaluation of new construction financing17
03.08.2019Purposeful financing — monthly burden19
12.08.2019Relation Construction sum / Financing - Survey24
22.04.2020Single-family home financing through stocks39
15.06.2022Realistic construction costs & financing planning?56
25.10.2023House construction financing: okay or better to make cuts?24

Oben