ETICS with concrete construction or exposed concrete?

11m2 for the child and 17m2 for the parents' bedroom despite the dressing room? I would feature the child more and take a step back myself... What do you need 17m2 just for a bed and sleeping? The child can use the 17m2 much better.... I'll never understand...

Yes, you're right, 17m² is big and it was smaller before because the first floor plan was smaller, but that's simply explained: The child does not exist and probably won't, and if there is one, then when the child is small, they will be in the small room and later in the study. The "children's room" will probably be a room for a spinning bike or a guest room.

The two load-bearing walls can be well designed with exposed concrete. I can also well imagine that if the rest remains restrained. Then they come into effect and are connecting elements. I find the children's room absolutely too small. I am not a fan of oversized children's rooms, but under 12 is too little, especially since the rest of the house is planned very generously. Even the heating room is larger [emoji44] The bathroom for a child should not be accessed through a parental area. Possibly one should therefore swap the office with the children's room, at least from the age when the child can be left alone on one level. The freezer room in the basement can be elegantly enlarged by shortening the long corridor. I am grateful for such an architectural design for the holidays :) [emoji8] Regards, Yvonne

The two supporting walls can be nicely finished with exposed concrete. I can also well imagine that if the rest is kept restrained. Then they will have an effect and act as connecting elements.
I find the children's room absolutely too small. I am not a fan of oversized children's rooms, but under 12 is too little, especially since the rest of the house is planned very generously. Even the heating room is larger [emoji44] Also, the bathroom for a child should not be accessed through a parent's area. Perhaps the office and the children's room should be swapped, at least from the age when the child can be left alone on one level.
The freezer room in the basement can be elegantly enlarged by shortening the long corridor.

I am grateful for such an architectural design for the holidays :) [emoji8]
Regards, Yvonne

So you are right about the children's room - but the explanation is above... Originally, there was also a door from the "child" room to the bathroom, but we rationalized that away because otherwise the already small room is hard to use. The room itself will suffice - and if there is a child, they can go upstairs to the "office" - and the office moves downstairs. The freezer room is supposed to stay as it is because the "elevator" is supposed to be a platform that can be "driven on" from the outside, so it would also be wheelchair accessible.
Why are you grateful for such a design during the holidays?

Eyes enjoy feasting every day on architectural designs that are good :) In everyday life, however, they become too boring - one wants to do something good here as well -> advise and/or improve.

Best regards, Yvonne

but aren’t we back to precast concrete parts here? We already had this topic in the other thread?!
According to ant1, due to prefabrication with batch size 1, it’s not achievable at realistic prices?!

You see, now, with a specific house in mind, you can look at it more precisely case by case: for this house – by the way, in my opinion a design that does not "suffer" in the overall effect with plaster, but looks just as good with a plastered exterior as with exposed concrete – it is overall coherent, and for the 7 and 11 Turbo can be called downright "adequate."

You can do it with precast parts, in cast-in-place concrete, or combined.

More precisely: in the factory (as a custom-made piece, since no wall module repeats in a specific grid for this house, so each part is different) a thin concrete wall for the "inside" and a counterpart for the "outside" are produced and joined together at a certain distance. This twin precast part is then used as a "lost formwork" for a concrete core poured on site (and for a currently code-compliant residential building requires an insulation layer on the outside).

You can also do it so that instead of the cast-in-place concrete layer, an insulation layer is inserted, then you have concrete for both outer surfaces. However, the inner shell cannot then be formed as a thin "lost formwork," but must structurally replace the cast-in-place concrete layer of the variant described above. Therefore, it weighs considerably more, which affects transport logistics and possible panel dimensions.

Have a look at KX and XCON from Dennert Massivhaus.

I join Yvonne’s thanks for an architect’s design at Easter

Well, it's not more precise, but just one variant explained; as said, there are many ways to Rome.