Can you elaborate on that? I don’t necessarily see it that way, rather the advantages of @RotorMotor.
So first of all, the additional cost of design flooring compared to laminate is about 100%. Cheap ones start at around 20 EUR, good ones at 40 EUR, and the supposed luxury class from 60 EUR upwards. The last time I checked, laminate was really almost exactly half the price. Now, the fact that a floor with a correspondingly higher usage class always becomes more durable is true for all materials, so in that respect not an advantage of the material. On the contrary, with vinyl you often hear about scratches very early on. More like a fine type that spreads like a veil. This simply has to do with the fact that the top layer is at the same time the decor layer. With laminate, you have a transparent plastic layer, then the decor carrier layer (cellulose), and then the carrier layer. This makes laminate visually less susceptible to light scratches because the decor layer is not scratched at the same time. The fact that vinyl is not a problem with water is only true for "full vinyl." So only if it’s not on a carrier board. However, this is usually much thinner and thus much more susceptible to unevenness in the floor. Also, such vinyl can, as far as I know, only be glued down. The other vinyl then has the same problem due to the HDF carrier board, which, to be honest, is only a problem with standing water for a long time. And standing water, while full vinyl may not be affected by it, still runs underneath and can ferment there in a nice microclimate under the floor and seep into the floor and walls... I would doubt any grease stains. I think it depends on the specific material. I have certainly also seen strange shiny spots caused by grease on plastics. But I admit, I am not aware of that with vinyl. Just as little as with laminate. Anyway, compared to solid wood parquet, no advantage because you can oil parquet for maintenance and thus naturally work in stains. The thermal conductivity is indeed better than with parquet and also laminate, that’s true. The "soft feeling" is often touted; compared to glued parquet I can’t feel a difference, and with laminate, in my opinion, it’s so minor that, at least for me, it wouldn’t be worth a 100% price premium. So if you are already thinking about replacing after 5-10 years anyway, I would rather lay it floating and then you can just take laminate and save money. If not, ’s advice makes sense and you take wood with a thick wear layer right away. But you have to pay a bit more for that. I would then probably rather glue it down because of underfloor heating.