Samantheus
2021-06-26 15:10:06
- #1
Significant reasons for me were lack of time regarding personal effort (stressful job + small child + construction project is already enough), great distance between the construction site and current place of residence (approx. 300km), no experience of the heating installer with it, and if something goes wrong you have to dig up the garden again...
No, there isn’t any yet. Thanks for the tip.
I would bring up the topic of BKA again with the contractor. Although to be honest I still have doubts whether it is worth it. I pay 5k EUR extra for the heat pump’s cooling function (5k) + BKA material (1k) + BKA installation (1.5k) + split unit in the office (7k) [except for the cooling function, all estimates of course]. Am I really coming out significantly under 19k in the end? I feel like I might save a bit but have significantly less cooling capacity?
My father-in-law suggested one idea, but I have my doubts about it and would be interested in your opinion. They live on the directly neighboring property and still have a very old oil heating system that will probably give up soon. His idea was whether boreholes for a groundwater heat pump could be made and the wells used jointly.
Advantages would be:
- Passive cooling
- Groundwater at approx. 6m depth, so not very complicated
- Shared costs for drilling
Disadvantages/risks:
- Is operating 2 heat pumps from one well even possible?
- Houses quite far apart (approx. 20m), is that even easily possible at that distance?
- Legal situation with cross-property installation?
- What if their house is sold / rented out?
Therefore, I am currently somewhat skeptical... but if BKA is potentially an option, such a groundwater heat pump would probably not be bad if it is reasonably cost-effective.
It depends entirely on the design: for example, with 18 degrees flow temperature, 23 degrees return temperature, and 20 l/min flow rate: (20*60)/1000 * 1.16 * (23-1) = 6.96 kW. However, this first requires determination of the required cooling load (usually significantly lower than the heating load). Are there already any results on this? This would be, by the way, generally the first step for me before selecting the technology.
No, there isn’t any yet. Thanks for the tip.
I would bring up the topic of BKA again with the contractor. Although to be honest I still have doubts whether it is worth it. I pay 5k EUR extra for the heat pump’s cooling function (5k) + BKA material (1k) + BKA installation (1.5k) + split unit in the office (7k) [except for the cooling function, all estimates of course]. Am I really coming out significantly under 19k in the end? I feel like I might save a bit but have significantly less cooling capacity?
My father-in-law suggested one idea, but I have my doubts about it and would be interested in your opinion. They live on the directly neighboring property and still have a very old oil heating system that will probably give up soon. His idea was whether boreholes for a groundwater heat pump could be made and the wells used jointly.
Advantages would be:
- Passive cooling
- Groundwater at approx. 6m depth, so not very complicated
- Shared costs for drilling
Disadvantages/risks:
- Is operating 2 heat pumps from one well even possible?
- Houses quite far apart (approx. 20m), is that even easily possible at that distance?
- Legal situation with cross-property installation?
- What if their house is sold / rented out?
Therefore, I am currently somewhat skeptical... but if BKA is potentially an option, such a groundwater heat pump would probably not be bad if it is reasonably cost-effective.