Clinker directly on Ytong?

  • Erstellt am 2014-04-19 20:36:31

emer

2014-04-20 22:12:44
  • #1
Where do you get that with KfW70?
 

emer

2014-04-20 22:45:15
  • #2
I have to ask a silly question. I also have a calculation from my structural engineer according to the same DIN as in the [Schein]. He comes to 68 kWh / (m2•a) primary energy demand. For compliance with the Energy Saving Ordinance for new buildings, 73.30 would be required. Your primary energy demand is stated as 79.7. That would not even mean compliance with the Energy Saving Ordinance for me??? I am confused. Can someone clarify this for me?
 

emer

2014-04-20 22:50:32
  • #3
I will try again in German *g*

My calculated primary energy demand = 68.
On the certificate from my structural engineer, it says I need 73.30 to comply with the energy saving ordinance.

On baschti's certificate it says: 79.7.

Based on the same DIN standard.

That is above the 73.30 specified by my structural engineer for the energy saving ordinance (so above "KFW 100"?).

How does that add up?
 

baschti

2014-04-21 09:21:00
  • #4
Maybe it all has to do with floor area, type of energy, etc. When I enter Energiesparausweiss in Google image search, there are always different values given as the maximum value of the energy saving ordinance.
 

emer

2014-04-21 09:34:14
  • #5
Yes, but between 100 and 73 there is energetically speaking a small world.
 

Bauexperte

2014-04-22 08:50:15
  • #6
Hello,

I actually expected €uro to respond here; he is probably still on his well-deserved Easter vacation.


I would have been very surprised too, but 240 mm is already very good.


That is initially standard, since with the thickness of the floor slab the structural engineer - based on the soil survey - has a say. But it would be new to me that this provider voluntarily offers a thicker floor slab.

This is not the certification for your bungalow, right?

Kfw 70: The decisive factor is the annual primary energy demand Qp. Here, the maximum value of a building may be, for example, max. 70% of the value for the reference building (100%) according to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2014. And the transmission heat loss H'T may be max. 85% of the value for the reference building according to the Energy Saving Ordinance 2014. With a primary energy demand of 79.7% you therefore do not achieve the desired value KfW 70; at least not without further measures.

Rhenish greetings
 

Similar topics
18.09.2012Construction of a base slab with frost skirt but without foundation10
31.05.2015Wastewater pipe concreted in the floor slab at the wrong location29
17.09.2017Prefab House Forum - Complete house possible for 150,000?29
07.06.2013Is it mandatory to build according to the Energy Saving Ordinance (2009)?12
09.06.2015Gas, heat pump, and solar for a single-family house?36
19.06.2015Build according to KFW 70 or the Energy Saving Ordinance 201442
15.12.2019Aerated concrete exterior wall vs. Energy Saving Ordinance13
23.10.2015Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 - Gas boiler without solar?38
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
24.03.2016How can information such as the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 be accessed?14
11.09.2016Base plate - construction/insulation etc. - experiences please!10
29.07.2018Perimeter insulation under the floor slab and still XPS under the screed?28
23.02.2017New construction according to the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance no longer possible without a ventilation/exhaust system?40
08.10.2017KfW 55 without underfloor heating38
02.04.2018Offer structural engineer + thermal insulation certificate Energy Saving Ordinance 201616
06.09.2018Ground slab on a gentle slope for a single-family house with a basement11
13.08.2019Can we still slip into a KfW-55 house?14
15.12.2022Planning guest WC in new construction - How big should it be? (DIN?)107
27.12.2022Door DIN left or right – are both possible?17

Oben