Because it is, from a societal perspective, cheaper nonsense.
Here is a quote from a recent Bundestag debate: "whereas the new Baukindergeld of 400 million euros per year does not even reach the euro rescue costs of twelve hours"
If you put this into relation to the home ownership allowance of approx. 11.4 billion euros, which was paid out in 2004, your argument is all the more refuted.
How to implement this can be discussed, but to say flatly that it is useless I consider wrong.
Maybe it should not necessarily have been called Baukindergeld and thus made independent of homeownership status.
We are happy about the 24 thousand. From that, we can have half of the outdoor facilities done.
I always find it funny how people are brainwashed that there is no money in the household budget. This goes on until even the last Hartz 4 recipient speaks out against an increase in the standard rates.
Also always interesting that the finance minister position has now been filled repeatedly by a lawyer.