Building a house financially feasible or a pipe dream?

  • Erstellt am 2017-08-01 14:39:53

Caspar2020

2017-08-03 13:31:59
  • #1


That was once the case. Since the WIKR came into force last April, most bankers are actually bound by much more standardized processes. In other words, if the household calculation doesn’t work, or the life phase model fails, your household ledger won’t help you that much.
 

HilfeHilfe

2017-08-03 13:34:36
  • #2
sorry, but with the income and the ever increasing amounts (now they are already talking about 450k and up) and 3 children who also cost money, this is increasingly becoming harakiri.

Especially since the parents would also have to participate. What if they refuse?

They have a right of residence in the house. You or the new buyer won’t get them out that quickly.
 

Xorrhal

2017-08-03 13:36:34
  • #3


Yes, that may well be. Supposedly, it is meant to "protect" the customers.

I am aware that I cannot influence what banks calculate. However, I feel on the safe side because I know what I can afford – thanks to the household book. If the bank says "No" there – then that’s just how it is.
 

HilfeHilfe

2017-08-03 13:38:15
  • #4


completely legitimate. do you have siblings? if yes, do they also want a piece of the pie?
 

Xorrhal

2017-08-03 13:42:50
  • #5
Siblings yes, but they have already been paid out.
 

chand1986

2017-08-03 14:06:27
  • #6


Am I crazy? What kind of mileage do they have per year?

Anyone thinking at least somewhat economically buys a good used car and drives it until it falls apart. Ideally, in old age, that only happens after they themselves fall apart.

If you’re hesitating because you urgently need more space for the kids, but at the same time old debts from the previous renovation are still hanging over you and the beneficiaries of all this treat themselves to a new car every 5 years, then the priorities are skewed.



Or heating instead of cars... Were there no reserves for the maintenance of the house?

Yes. Sell the house and downsize. That doesn’t have to come with a reduction in quality of life, unless you think you are exclusively what you own.

It already sounds like you’d be the ideal son-in-law for your in-laws, sorry to say so. You received the house at exactly the right moment to take care of the livable environment with your money, which the two of them – unless their pensions are very low – should actually take care of themselves. But as I said, with low pensions you don’t finance cars on a five-year cycle...

It’s all no use, now you are a prisoner of your in-laws, whether voluntarily and happily is none of my business.

Economically, it simply culminates in the fact that you can only afford the necessary space expansion with difficulty and the option of new construction probably falls away because of the price. As a lover of improvisation, I would probably choose the extension as plan A. Plan B would be to buy an existing property, if possible and suitable. But with plan A, the old debts are blocking you, great... I would still try it via a bank change.
 
Oben