That's nice - then you don't need to plant your own tree. You always have leaves somewhere anyway. It doesn't matter whether the tree stands next to you or 20 meters away: the wind does that all by itself, either blowing "foreign" leaves to you or blowing your own or nearby leaves away.
- I think he doesn't like trees, no leaves, and no tree-related stuff!
Is there an official reason for the re-planning? If it concerns [Gemeinschaftseigentum], you will hardly have any leverage. It is better to try to ensure that it is a tree as small as possible without sticky stuff. So, for example, a smoke bush, gumball, ball ginkgo.
The tree was previously placed on the area marked with the “X,” and now it is supposed to be moved to the spot where the arrow is.
Thank you for posting the plan! What does the design plan say? What kind of trees will be planted? That is only a 2-meter strip – so very likely a narrow avenue tree or an evergreen column will be planted there. To my knowledge, no plants that would restrict the purpose of the location are planted. Therefore, I would not expect, for example, a linden or chestnut tree to be planted that could affect the parking spaces underneath.
Appointment with the lawyer initiated what can be done there?
But aside from sensitivities: I think that in the fine print of the contract possible changes are regulated, namely that changes must be accepted, that is regarding the common areas.
I think that the fine print in the contract regulates possible changes, namely that changes must be accepted, specifically regarding the communal areas.
Furthermore, the distance to the accompanying greenery of the parking spaces regularly does not have the status of a guaranteed characteristic. So, for example, one acquires a parking space for a residential unit, which is also designated by its number in the contract and the declaration of division, but not its distance to the nearest source of leaf fall. A judge will also interpret the site plan as more information rather than a guarantee. For example, if house B5 is assigned the parking space St27 on the path to "its" row of houses and the Ga17 with the possibility of a back door into its garden, and this assignment were to be changed, I would consider that relevant. If the buyer of house B5 were to receive St30 instead of St27 (on "its" path, and separated from the nearest tree by it), newly located on the path to another row and immediately at the tree location, most judges would probably criticize the increased distance between house and parking space, but not the eliminated intermediate space between parking space and tree.