11ant
2018-10-05 18:15:54
- #1
Mostly retirees (but not to be enrolled in a chronic care program), from a billing perspective the death of a general practice.Everyone who is retiring now will remain a customer of the TE for another 30 years.
Mostly retirees (but not to be enrolled in a chronic care program), from a billing perspective the death of a general practice.Everyone who is retiring now will remain a customer of the TE for another 30 years.
That is probably the reason why the doctors want to go to the city, right?Mostly retirees (but not to be enrolled in a chronic care program), billing-wise the death of a general practitioner's practice.
That’s what I meant. I didn’t know it even existed, so I had alternatively asked about the averaged market prices of the neighboring villages. In some places there is no open market, but only the municipality offers openly and otherwise only under the pub table the Sepp from Vincenz buys directly.the "official" price per square meter is about twice as high
It seems to me that billing was somewhat neglected in your training (it’s nice when doctors are good physicians first, but you also have to be able to make a living from it). For a specialist this is not a problem, but for a general practitioner then "the point is worth nothing" if you work "too much." With the patients’ age, the share of house calls increases. If you have "nursing homes," that’s great: drive there once, bill for twenty house calls, all patients "in one spot." But if scattered each in their single-family house? – I’ve experienced dozens of cases: doctor over 70 finally found a highly motivated young practice successor, but regularly then the bank turns that down: bad buzzword BWA.No come on, you can also finance a practice with almost only pensioners. That is definitely not the death of the general practitioner’s practice.