Build according to KFW 70 or the Energy Saving Ordinance 2014

  • Erstellt am 2015-06-05 17:34:00

Tommes78

2015-06-06 15:31:51
  • #1
Glad the floor plan is liked. Nice to hear something positive for a change. The architect is planning with gas and solar; we actually wanted to inquire about geothermal energy as well. It's currently also being subsidized. It would be our favorite. Several acquaintances are very satisfied. The architect says it will be significantly more expensive despite subsidies. The companies would just add the subsidy costs on top again. That's also a statement I don't understand. Regarding the wall construction, 17.5 brick + ETICS (Styrofoam) is planned, although I prefer mineral wool. But according to the architect, it is significantly more expensive.
 

Endukt

2015-06-06 15:59:18
  • #2
Yes, heat pumps using geothermal energy, that is brine/water via ground collectors or ground probes, are significantly more expensive, as drilling for ground probes alone incurs additional costs of around €8,000. Furthermore, your primary energy factor for the heat pump (currently 2.4 for electricity) divided by the annual performance factor of about 3.5 with 0.68 is still more than three times as high as that of the pellet heating system. Styrofoam, i.e. EPS, is already the insulation material with the best price-performance ratio. Sand-lime brick should be cheaper in the wall structure than conventional bricks.
 

Legurit

2015-06-06 16:45:36
  • #3
But let's not compare apples and oranges... A seasonal performance factor of 3.5 with a brine-water heat pump is hardly achievable deliberately... >4.5 can be assumed, especially when talking about the subsidy. It amounts to 4.5 T € and is intended as an incentive...
 

oleda222

2015-06-06 18:24:26
  • #4
Taking only the first one and then just the extremely expensive drilling as a comparison is very hypocritical.
 

Tommes78

2015-06-07 09:54:05
  • #5
What kind of roller shutter boxes are installed when building according to the KfW 70 standard? Our architect always says that these are much more expensive than normal ones. He also says that with KfW 70 or better, they can only be opened from the outside. Is that correct?
 

oleda222

2015-06-07 10:37:20
  • #6
That depends on the entire building. For KfW 55, we do not require roller shutter boxes that can only be accessed from the outside for inspection. Therefore, the statement cannot be generally true.
 

Similar topics
03.06.2016Trench collector brine-water heat pump or air-water heat pump?49
19.05.2021Experiences with brine heat pump491
06.12.2015Heat pump / final energy demand / annual performance factor20
18.10.2016Which heat pump? Ventilation system / Air-to-water heat pump93
24.02.2017LWW, gas or geothermal operating cost experiences35
30.09.2018BAFA funding for air-water heat pumps in new construction - how does it work?30
22.02.2018Air-water heat pump and water-driven pellet stove and photovoltaic system17
31.05.2018Air-water heat pump including ventilation system vs. brine heat pump including ventilation system15
25.03.2019Heating concept for single-family house new build approx. 190m²: Split heat pump vs. ground source (brine)13
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
22.11.2019Feedback on heat pump / offer requested!46
07.05.2020Collaboration of air-water heat pump, photovoltaic system, and storage38
20.01.2020New BAFA funding - Air-to-water heat pump with solar thermal39
24.01.2020Annual performance factor calculation for funding (parameters and calculation tool)29
27.01.2020KFW40 House Project 2020 *Planning Ideas*32
24.05.2020Heat pump and BAFA - What is true and what is not?24
14.10.2022Air-to-water heat pump sizing in new construction311
04.01.2022Air-water heat pump current consumption and data1439
10.08.2022Hydrogeological Report - Geothermal Energy, Air-Water Heat Pump or Ice Storage?26
11.02.2025KFW 40, Ground-water heat pump worthwhile or is air-water better?15

Oben