Complete renovation of an old existing building does not have to be so much better for the environment than an ecological new building.
It is clear that in general renovation is better than new construction.
These two statements completely contradict each other. Please don’t come now with "case-by-case considerations," those can be constructed arbitrarily.
You always only compare heat pump vs. gas.
I don’t compare anything, but question absurd theories and speculations.
It hardly brings savings either, but costs a lot of money and practically forces you to have a larger buffer storage.
A certain saving already comes from a sealed bellows meter reading between May and September, but of course you won’t recoup the ~8,000 € investment anytime soon that way. You do it because you have to, although there are probably ways to build in compliance with the ST Energy Saving Ordinance without ST.
An ideological question: What is “greener” now, the condensing boiler with biogas tariff or the heat pump with lignite tariff?