So seriously: it is completely legitimate to achieve the highest possible price when selling a good you own, isn't it? Or does everyone here give away their possessions or labor?
So seriously: it is completely legitimate to achieve the highest possible price when selling a good you own, isn't it? Or does everyone else give away their possessions or labor?
Have fun with dynamic pricing in the supermarket. When it's shortly before closing time, and the chain's AI has calculated with your Android data that you urgently need milk, butter, and the one missing ingredient for Sunday dinner. You could also take gas station prices, or even pharmacy prices? You are never alone, but always in pairs at a store. And the general business culture is shaped by that.
So seriously: it is completely legitimate to achieve the highest possible price when selling a good you own, right? Or does everyone else here give away their possessions or labor?
Maybe it's because this forum is mainly active with buyers who see it from the other perspective. For buyers, everything that could increase the price is bad by default – out of self-interest, I can understand that.
But that does not automatically make every seller who wants to maximize their profit a heartless, tax-evading rip-off artist.
Somehow I can't quite believe that I am the only seller who is interested in achieving the highest selling price by legitimate means ...
You are not, and I can only agree with you. The exaggerated reactions from some here are inappropriate. Of course, you want to sell your property as well as possible. The hunt for the highest offer, however, can also become an obsession. We did it the other way around and fixed the price we absolutely wanted. On top of that, we added all the sales costs. I would call this sum the minimum and then start the bidding process. Done. (In our case, the property was actually sold beforehand, there was no bidding process anymore.)