TaiiTvv
2022-09-06 12:14:55
- #1
That is of course the most expensive option and also the one that is more or less restricted because you still have to rely on the outdated conventional wiring. Flush-mounted actuators are simply more expensive by nature (calculated per channel) than, for example, an 8-channel actuator in the control cabinet.
He presented this as the cheapest and low-budget variant of Free@Home.
Yes, you could say that, since free@home is basically KNX, just the stripped-down version. But the wiring is the same. If you want to do it like that, then just skip the f@h actuators directly; why pay double or triple for everything?
I thought with KNX all actuators are in the control cabinet and you only have sensors and switches in the rooms. The sensors and switches then send commands to the actuators which switch lights and blinds, or did I misunderstand that?
Do you think we can do it with the variant from Free@Home like that? So all sensors/switches and actuators combined in one device or in one switch?