Basic land planning

2019-07-03 15:47:39

Nepotism would definitely also work with co-brothers-in-law *SCNR*

Either there would be a development plan designating the area, for example, as a general residential area, certainly unusual in this location,

Gladly also as WR, MI, or MD - it just should not be an outer area (as feared here).

An extension is somewhat (from what one reads here) less critical than a standalone new building.

In the outer area, that hardly makes a difference. Sorry, if I say "one swallow does not make a summer" considering the temperatures of last weekend, but: a single rabbit hutch or pear tree - alternatively: that little bit of hemp for personal use - does not make a farmer in the sense of an approvable residential area in the outer area.

2019-07-03 23:12:50

> I actually meant the land use plan - sorry for the confusion at this point.

OK, then I assume with 99% certainty that there is no development plan.

the shown buildings are all purely residential houses.

Is house no. 38 inhabited by a farmer, his parents, or his children? (Gender advocates please forgive me)

That is not the case.

Yes, here the restrictions are limited if the relatives grant the building encumbrances.

What qualifies the property as a "building plot"?

The conversation with the district master builder (post #1) and the land use plan (post #7).

the property is unsuitable.

Why do you always have to exaggerate like that. Think of Oakland – if he had already found a construction company, the shell would now stand on the property you considered non-buildable.

Alternatively the question whether the property can still be expanded

It's definitely worth asking, but I estimate the chances of success to be very low. But it is not necessary at all. With the appropriate setback building encumbrances on the neighboring properties, your development proposal is not unrealistic, even with a floor space index of 0.6. The garden can be laid out on the field. Just keep in mind that any structural installations are not permitted there, so also terrace, garden house, solid pool, ...

2019-07-04 00:54:18

Is house no. 38 inhabited by a farmer, his parents, or his children? (Gender friends, please forgive me)

How do I now get the childreninnen in house no. 38 out of my mental movie?

2019-07-04 09:58:46

OK, then I assume with 99% probability that there is no development plan.

Is house no. 38 inhabited by a farmer, his parents, or his children? (Gender friends, please forgive me)

Yes, the restrictions are quite limited here if the relatives grant the building obligations.

The conversation with the district building master (post #1) and the land use plan (post #7).

Why do you always have to exaggerate like that? Think of Oakland – if he had already found a construction company, the shell of the building would now stand on the plot, which you considered undevelopable.

It is definitely worth inquiring, but I estimate the chances of success to be very low. But it is not necessary at all. With the appropriate building obligation set-backs on the neighboring plots, your development proposal is not unrealistic, even with a floor space index of 0.6. The garden can be laid out on the field. Just keep in mind that any structural facilities there are prohibited, so also terrace, garden house, solid pool, ...

Neither a farmer nor any ancestors live on the entire site. As I said, the grandparents operated a farm there, which was discontinued around 1970. To complete the topic: my father lives in building 34 and my uncle in house 36. House 38 is inhabited by my cousin.

My father spoke with the district building master some time ago – apparently, the statement was made that garages or similar are quite conceivable outside the property. Since I only have this information second-hand, I have to follow up again as mentioned.

2019-07-04 10:08:44

My father lives in building 34 and my uncle in house 36. House 38 is inhabited by my cousin.

What about the rest of the village?

2019-07-04 10:45:33

There are also supposed to be some other residents there, including a new development area for newcomers :P

Basic land planning

11ant

Escroda

11ant

The heel

kaho674

The heel