Apply for play street...

  • Erstellt am 2015-04-04 19:42:42

Musketier

2015-04-09 13:58:03
  • #1


You are currently right about that. Whether they would be enough if not everyone could park on the street remains to be seen.



Yes, there is also a lot of other nonsense in there. Only what would actually make sense, like the creation of the playground designated in the development plan, is not being implemented. In my opinion, the speed works quite well here so far. During the day, when the kids are playing outside, everyone drives quite carefully (except for the postwoman and courier services). And the courier drivers wouldn’t observe it even in a traffic-calmed zone.

Somehow I’ve revealed too much that I’m already getting my own development plan thrown at me.
 

Bauherren2014

2015-04-09 18:20:58
  • #2


Don't worry. You can only think that if you are a local and have built there yourself.



I definitely agree with you. But that has other ("political") reasons.



Well, unfortunately not as it should be. Unfortunately, some people who have small children themselves are not interested either.

In the end, it is like this: If everyone were a little more responsible and thought not only of themselves but also of their fellow human beings, then we wouldn't even have to discuss the topic.
 

nathi

2015-04-09 21:17:18
  • #3
The parking problem in new residential areas is generally self-made. Although there is a double garage, it is full of junk, which is why one "has to" park on public land. In our area, there is a 30 km/h zone, which I find okay since a bus runs there and it should eventually reach its destination. However, the dead-end streets could easily be designated as VBB if the direct residents agree. Besides them, almost no one drives in there anyway.
 

Wastl

2015-04-10 07:49:29
  • #4
For all those who, for administrative reasons, do not get VBB approval (I still use the term Spielstraße - here in Bavaria everyone knows that this means VBB): There are newer models that have lower practical requirements (road surface, street design, development plan, etc.) and in implementation are not as dramatic as the Spielstraße: Shared Space (and Begegnungsbereich). Interesting concepts - just google them - could also be a good compromise between Spielstraße and 30 km/h zone for us.
 

Skaddler

2015-04-10 09:05:55
  • #5
Shared Space is generally worthwhile. In the Netherlands, this works excellently in some cases. I am a geographer with a focus on urban and traffic planning and can only support this concept. A positive aspect is the education of traffic participants to be considerate of each other and to regard other traffic participants as equals. This should definitely be pursued further.
 

Bauexperte

2015-04-10 10:42:58
  • #6

That is an interesting approach!

Best regards from the Rhineland
 

Similar topics
10.12.2012Terrain elevations in the development plan are incorrect.12
14.04.2015Uneconomic development plan31
04.05.2015How long is a development plan valid?20
21.12.2017Development plan - 1.5-story building?16
16.02.2016Regulations regarding development plans, any experiences?22
13.06.2016Build an investment property, despite a 1 1/2-story development plan11
14.11.2016Horse chestnut in the development plan13
21.02.2017Development plan difference between ground floor, roof, and single-storey17
20.04.2017Development plan for a multi-family house16
05.10.2017Property / Development Plan / Retaining Walls / Excavations17
28.02.2018Deviation from the development plan in the new construction area is possible118
18.01.2019Development plan: Garage on the boundary outside the building window53
09.07.2018Demolition of existing house - new construction: what does the development plan allow?11
15.08.2018Basic floor area ratio / floor area ratio for plots without a development plan: How to calculate? Experiences?18
15.04.2019Opinions on floor plan design (Iso views, floor plans, development plan)43
27.09.2018Development plan roof shapes / distance - What is allowed?12
07.10.2018Development plan deviations - the neighbors do not want to agree15
30.01.2019Deviations from the development plan clinker - experiences?27
18.04.2019Development plan of 1998 - Setting the eaves height to a maximum of 3.00m12
25.07.2019Bungalow with special development plan ... more ideas?41

Oben