PATPATPAT
2024-08-07 13:37:41
- #1
Hello friends.
Please excuse this "Bild-Zeitung" headline. But actually, the cost estimate from the window builder is in this range. Sure, there are 12 windows, a large sliding door, and two large triangular gable windows included. It may be that the windows and installation are that expensive... but I am currently wondering if I want to spend that.
The windows are now 30 years old (wooden windows, double glazing). Apart from the fact that the insulation value is certainly miserable by today's standards, the windows are otherwise fine - still look good, close well, nothing leaks. We pay about 2600 euros in energy costs per year. Even if I saved 600 euros per year (exaggerated) with the new windows - the windows would only have paid off in 60 years... by then I would be 104 years old (and the windows long since "junk") ... That makes no sense, right? I am thinking about leaving the windows as they are and rather paying more for the energy. How do you see it? Do you have similar thoughts? Or is there a reasonable reason to invest after all? Has anyone here "only" replaced their windows? What effect did it really have on energy costs?
PS: It is a timber frame house from 1980 in the countryside (more of a C location). It has 14cm of continuous insulation above the rafters and we would also insulate the basement ceiling. We do not want to tackle the house facade. Windows were a consideration - but because of the payback period, I am very doubtful... Resale value is not really important because of the C location either...
Please excuse this "Bild-Zeitung" headline. But actually, the cost estimate from the window builder is in this range. Sure, there are 12 windows, a large sliding door, and two large triangular gable windows included. It may be that the windows and installation are that expensive... but I am currently wondering if I want to spend that.
The windows are now 30 years old (wooden windows, double glazing). Apart from the fact that the insulation value is certainly miserable by today's standards, the windows are otherwise fine - still look good, close well, nothing leaks. We pay about 2600 euros in energy costs per year. Even if I saved 600 euros per year (exaggerated) with the new windows - the windows would only have paid off in 60 years... by then I would be 104 years old (and the windows long since "junk") ... That makes no sense, right? I am thinking about leaving the windows as they are and rather paying more for the energy. How do you see it? Do you have similar thoughts? Or is there a reasonable reason to invest after all? Has anyone here "only" replaced their windows? What effect did it really have on energy costs?
PS: It is a timber frame house from 1980 in the countryside (more of a C location). It has 14cm of continuous insulation above the rafters and we would also insulate the basement ceiling. We do not want to tackle the house facade. Windows were a consideration - but because of the payback period, I am very doubtful... Resale value is not really important because of the C location either...