Specki
2017-11-03 20:17:21
- #1
First of all, thank you for your answers.
As I wrote, I get the fuel quite cheaply. I once made a comparison with gas. To achieve the same heating effect, wood costs me only a third of what gas does.
Thanks, I will have a look at that.
So, as it looks, in terms of acquisition costs, an air-to-water heat pump is really already better now, since you can save a lot.
I am basically also convinced that a heat pump has many advantages in many respects for a well to very well insulated house. What bothers me massively, however, is the dependence on electricity and electricity prices. And a photovoltaic system doesn’t help much if the sun hardly shines in winter or there is snow on it…
Regards Specki
Even from today's perspective, these heaters only make sense in new buildings if the fuel is available cheaply or free of charge.
As I wrote, I get the fuel quite cheaply. I once made a comparison with gas. To achieve the same heating effect, wood costs me only a third of what gas does.
Check out jenni.ch, you can find something there
Thanks, I will have a look at that.
So, as it looks, in terms of acquisition costs, an air-to-water heat pump is really already better now, since you can save a lot.
I am basically also convinced that a heat pump has many advantages in many respects for a well to very well insulated house. What bothers me massively, however, is the dependence on electricity and electricity prices. And a photovoltaic system doesn’t help much if the sun hardly shines in winter or there is snow on it…
Regards Specki