Window connecting elements (wood, slate)

  • Erstellt am 2019-10-20 20:05:47

guckuck2

2019-10-22 20:44:33
  • #1
Just ask the architect how he plans to implement that. A wooden facade under 6cm including the battens won’t work.
 

dertill

2019-10-23 08:17:19
  • #2


What problems should arise from that?
With monolithic construction, you won't get around cladding the lintels and ring beams with insulation materials. I have never seen it done differently so far (since 2002). And with 40 cm walls, there is still enough space for insulation next to the lintel.

The size of the window areas has no influence on the energy saving ordinance or on meeting the requirements! Although you have a higher heat demand depending on the orientation of the glass surfaces, i.e., with less window area, the energy saving ordinance simply compares the component properties and not the size of the window areas or the dimensions/volume of your building.
This only becomes relevant with KfW40+ and passive house standards.

I also see the flush wooden facade critically. It should work with the slate elements. Flat cladding bricks or slips have a build-up height of less than 2 cm. This should be able to be accommodated instead of the plaster.
 

benediktr

2019-10-26 19:22:04
  • #3


The architect doesn’t know anything about that. That was a question from my side.



Because of the low bulk density of aerated concrete, I thought that the bearing points of the lintel might have to be made from a different material.



Today I saw a very nice house again in a new development area with large-format flat cladding bricks.
 

benediktr

2020-01-05 14:43:53
  • #4
In the meantime, I have discussed the topic with the architect, and the solution approach was to create a thinner wall structure in the area of the connecting windows in order to end at least flush or even with a slight offset.

Unfortunately, the idea was quickly pushed back again due to its complexity. I have now given it some more thought and have the following approach:

Exterior walls:

Aerated concrete 36.5 cm -> U-value: approx. 0.18 W/m2K

Exterior ends between the windows:

Aerated concrete 17.5 cm, 12 cm Multipor WAP -> U-value: approx. 0.23 W/m2K

What do you think about this in terms of the cost-benefit ratio?
 

Similar topics
22.08.2010Must the dream of owning a home remain just a dream?14
06.02.2017Insulate new construction 36.5 aerated concrete?60
15.12.2019Aerated concrete exterior wall vs. Energy Saving Ordinance13
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
24.12.2015Single-family house, Energy Saving Ordinance 2016, developer recommends additional insulation - is it sensible?39
09.05.2016Compliance with the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance with the following heating14
03.07.2016U-value of windows - differences15
25.06.2016How important is the U-value of interior walls?12
14.04.2017House construction from concrete vs Energy Saving Ordinance 201631
13.04.2017U-value of windows: 1.3 - is an upgrade worth it?16
01.06.2017Floor plan single-family house 160m²22
19.07.2017How can one circumvent the Energy Saving Ordinance and avoid bureaucratic madness?161
20.07.2018Too many windows for the Energy Saving Ordinance 201612
29.01.2019Responsibility of the architect in case of KfW interest and further matters148
27.08.2018New building shell construction selection: Choose a company or architects?52
07.05.2020U-value outer wall 0.26 - is that okay?13
06.11.2018Ytong Energy Saving Regulation 25cm stone thickness allowed - Who has experience?17
13.12.2019Aerated concrete 42.5 lambda 0.08 or 0.0932
25.09.2024Architect search Munich + surrounding area (recommendations?)15

Oben