darksun
2023-09-27 15:54:22
- #1
Hello,
we have built and now we have an "uncertainty" about who has to bear the costs for the necessary L-stones in the area of the garages/parking space.
For your information, there are two houses, the driveway area and the house area of both houses were excavated and are now at (let's say) 0 meters height.
That fits.
The area for the two garages and the parking space between the garages is also at 0 meters.
Garage A is (at the back) earth-pressure resistant and is to be filled with soil.
The adjacent parking area A will receive L-stones at the back so that the garden area returns to the height level as indicated in the building plan (let's say: height 270cm).
Neighbor A will pay for these L-stones.
It is unclear what happens with the area marked in red.
L-stones are also needed there because the side wall of garage B is not earth-pressure resistant and must be protected from soil on this side.
Neighbor A argues:
B must pay because the (original) height, as in the development plan (in the garden area), must be restored and in the 2m area of the side wall of the garage soil must also be refilled.
Neighbor B argues:
Neighbor A must pay for the L-stones on his garage side wall (2m) so that no soil can press against and damage his garage side wall.
The refilled soil would damage neighbor B's garage.
How does it look, how are the heights to be understood in the development plan?
Does A have to bear the costs so that this height can be restored,
or B, because the red area must be brought back to the height in the development plan by him?
we have built and now we have an "uncertainty" about who has to bear the costs for the necessary L-stones in the area of the garages/parking space.
For your information, there are two houses, the driveway area and the house area of both houses were excavated and are now at (let's say) 0 meters height.
That fits.
The area for the two garages and the parking space between the garages is also at 0 meters.
Garage A is (at the back) earth-pressure resistant and is to be filled with soil.
The adjacent parking area A will receive L-stones at the back so that the garden area returns to the height level as indicated in the building plan (let's say: height 270cm).
Neighbor A will pay for these L-stones.
It is unclear what happens with the area marked in red.
L-stones are also needed there because the side wall of garage B is not earth-pressure resistant and must be protected from soil on this side.
Neighbor A argues:
B must pay because the (original) height, as in the development plan (in the garden area), must be restored and in the 2m area of the side wall of the garage soil must also be refilled.
Neighbor B argues:
Neighbor A must pay for the L-stones on his garage side wall (2m) so that no soil can press against and damage his garage side wall.
The refilled soil would damage neighbor B's garage.
How does it look, how are the heights to be understood in the development plan?
Does A have to bear the costs so that this height can be restored,
or B, because the red area must be brought back to the height in the development plan by him?