CChristian NW 2018-12-15 23:35:11#1I'm still building 211 is perfect. Every variant size also costs a lot more. The additional cost would be acceptable, it's just about the appearance right now .... ??!
I'm still building 211 is perfect. Every variant size also costs a lot more. The additional cost would be acceptable, it's just about the appearance right now .... ??!
Yypg 2018-12-16 00:24:42#2In your opinion, would 223 tall doors have looked just as good or even better from today's perspective? Since doors with a 2.01 height look okay/good/normal at a normal height of 2.50, I wouldn't worry about 2.63/2.11 at all.
In your opinion, would 223 tall doors have looked just as good or even better from today's perspective? Since doors with a 2.01 height look okay/good/normal at a normal height of 2.50, I wouldn't worry about 2.63/2.11 at all.
CChristian NW 2018-12-16 00:26:13#3Since with a normal height of 2.50 the doors of 2.01 look ok/good/normal, I wouldn’t worry at all with 2.63/2.11. That’s true, but would the 223 high ones possibly also or even better look at 263 clear ceiling height????????
Since with a normal height of 2.50 the doors of 2.01 look ok/good/normal, I wouldn’t worry at all with 2.63/2.11. That’s true, but would the 223 high ones possibly also or even better look at 263 clear ceiling height????????
CChristian NW 2018-12-16 00:57:35#5Ok. And what do the others say about 223.5 high doors with 263 cm high ceilings, does that look good, or do you also advise against it???
Ok. And what do the others say about 223.5 high doors with 263 cm high ceilings, does that look good, or do you also advise against it???
Yypg 2018-12-16 00:58:31#6That's true, but would the 223 highs possibly also or even better look at 263 clear ceiling height???? Exaggeration usually looks less.
That's true, but would the 223 highs possibly also or even better look at 263 clear ceiling height???? Exaggeration usually looks less.