ypg
2020-06-15 12:32:09
- #1
Our question is, however, how is the higher quality defined, do you also get it for less high-quality? Appearance is irrelevant at first.
Expensive does not have to be more valuable, but usually, more valuable is more expensive because the production is more elaborate.
What belongs to quality, among other things, I wrote in #4.
Besides, the quantity comes to mind. Mass-produced goods are cheaper, often sold in hardware stores. Some consciously do not want mass-produced goods, therefore they pay less for different goods, even if they may look the same to some.
One would now think, because obviously expensive = high quality, that this floor is high quality. In fact, the exact opposite is the case. The floor is a big mess. Looks great, everyone who sees it the first time says "Wooooow". The fact that we constantly have to remove some stains, have splinters in our feet, etc., of course only we know.
Sorry, natural products simply have such a property. Quality is not always easy to maintain. Rather the opposite: the feel is great, but maintenance effort and nature are enormously disadvantageous. This is also the case with an art print//oil painting, wooden door//plastic door, natural stone, porcelain stoneware tile, etc.
Plastic is simply easier to maintain but not more valuable compared to natural products. However, plastic can be more elaborately designed, so it can be twice as expensive as cheap plastic.
You could have had your parquet cheaper with expensive laminate, but then there would have been no praise from visitors; with cheap laminate, you would now be upset about wear.
To be honest, this is hard for us to judge. Especially since you don’t see them side by side.
Then it doesn’t matter anyway if you yourselves don’t recognize it.
As already said: there are people who see such things immediately and choose the "rarity" among the tiles for themselves, like to adorn themselves with it, but can also enjoy the difference themselves.