Voki1
2014-08-20 15:52:51
- #1
It is not terribly difficult to unravel. The question of the "formation" of the contract is perhaps a bit tricky, but the OP informed the architect that he would receive his fee even in the case of a "non-commission." Essentially, this certainly constitutes a contractual relationship, which basically includes termination while maintaining the client's payment obligation. If I were advising the architect, I would argue in this direction, especially since he did actually perform part of the work.
I would offer him appropriate compensation for the services rendered and possibly pay half. In court and on the high seas.... an uncertain prognosis for both.
I would offer him appropriate compensation for the services rendered and possibly pay half. In court and on the high seas.... an uncertain prognosis for both.