Termination of collaboration with architect - demands excessive fee

  • Erstellt am 2014-08-19 21:56:33

Voki1

2014-08-20 15:52:51
  • #1
It is not terribly difficult to unravel. The question of the "formation" of the contract is perhaps a bit tricky, but the OP informed the architect that he would receive his fee even in the case of a "non-commission." Essentially, this certainly constitutes a contractual relationship, which basically includes termination while maintaining the client's payment obligation. If I were advising the architect, I would argue in this direction, especially since he did actually perform part of the work.

I would offer him appropriate compensation for the services rendered and possibly pay half. In court and on the high seas.... an uncertain prognosis for both.
 

DNL

2014-08-20 17:10:20
  • #2
So, whether minimum or maximum rate, I believe the architect can choose quite freely. From what has been described, it doesn't seem like he has to apply the maximum rate. The underlying net amount (!) also appears too high compared to his own estimate. And the statement in the email was meant to convey that compensation should indeed be made for incurred efforts. However, that doesn't mean an architect has to go all out, and I also don't know if he would really get away with that. I would try to ask the architect for a conversation on equal footing, explain to him that the chemistry between you simply doesn't match—which he probably agrees with—and also tell him that you want to pay for his efforts, but fairly for both sides.
 

DNL

2014-08-20 17:22:02
  • #3
Have all four phases actually been completed in full?
 

Slintrebla

2014-08-20 19:21:31
  • #4
No, phase IV (approval phase) did not exist yet. Therefore, it is definitely not creditable. As for phase III (detailed design), it is only to be calculated proportionally because not everything was completed in the design.
 

Slintrebla

2014-08-20 19:24:05
  • #5


That’s exactly what I meant. I just want to compensate the architect for his effort since we did get one or two tips from him. That would be about 40 hours ± 10 hours at an hourly rate of maybe €100. That would be fair and acceptable to both parties. But not €16,000.
 

Voki1

2014-09-15 20:06:44
  • #6
Is there already a result?
 

Similar topics
23.10.2008We need an architect - or should I do it myself?14
02.01.2009Experiences with architects15
19.03.2013Turnkey or build with architects?19
21.07.2013Cost estimates from two architects differ greatly!10
13.11.2013Do you absolutely need an architect?10
16.12.2013Pre-planning with the architect - is having your own floor plan sensible?18
30.01.2014Architect's cost estimation15
21.08.2014Construction costs when building with architects. What does your experience say?18
11.02.2015Cost planning for a single-family house including land, additional costs, architect32
19.12.2014Finding architects - but how?26
08.09.2015Massive house by the architect, approximate costs?16
23.09.2015Responsibilities of the Architect in Tendering18
29.10.2015Is it normal for the purchase of land to be tied to an architect?16
19.01.2016Construction project with architects31
20.08.2016Should the house be planned by a general contractor or architects?30
10.03.2017Payment of the architect16
12.10.2017Cost of enclosed space. First draft discussed with architects27
27.10.2017Construction description by architects: Who has experience?13
07.02.2018Architect's suggestions disappointing - What next?32
16.02.2018Stress with the architect - naively signed the preliminary contract17

Oben