The value of the property is only really interesting to the bank when the loan is no longer being repaid.
Why should the bank forcibly auction off a secure loan if the loan is always paid on time?
Here's an example:
Loan amount: €350,000
Value of the house at purchase: €400,000
Value of the property due to boom: €200,000
Outstanding debt on the day of the boom: €320,000
Sale proceeds calculated through forced auction: €150,000
Loss for the bank: €320,000 - €150,000 = €170,000
Further losses due to immense disputes in court. They will never see the outstanding amount of €170,000 because private customers simply file for insolvency (have to). High loan without collateral = hopelessly in debt
The loan was always paid on time monthly. If the bank cancels the loan, the medium-sized business is driven into insolvency without reason. That, in turn, could be a great opportunity for the court, and the state would have to put a stop to it (just like back then with the sale of loans and their cancellation).
In summary: about 50% loss of the loan, simply self-inflicted. If the loan were simply allowed to continue, money would continue coming in, and the loss on default would become smaller month by month. If the loan did not default at all, that would also be a win for the bank.
Conclusion: the bank has absolutely no interest in canceling the loan due to a loss in the value of the property. Their interest lies solely in the loan being repaid.
It only gets difficult with a follow-up loan at the end of the fixed interest period.
With extremely high property losses, I see completely different possibilities for cheating. The old owners stop paying, the auction takes place, and a relative buys the house cheaply, while the old owners file for insolvency. In the above case, €170,000 (- insolvency money) saved just like that. Of course, the requirements are high, bla bla, but for €150,000 they will come up with something.