Subsequent change of the lending value - What happens?

  • Erstellt am 2019-05-17 07:02:55

Noelmaxim

2019-05-17 12:23:11
  • #1
???? So at the beginning additional costs, so that the remaining debt at the end is 0.3% lower, ok, also a point of view.
 

Noelmaxim

2019-05-17 12:24:23
  • #2
By the way, as long as it makes sense, the start of repayment can also be set to immediate.
 

nordanney

2019-05-17 12:25:33
  • #3
Shit, then only idiots like me are working at our bank with about 10-11 billion euros in new business per year. Thanks for the hint.
 

Noelmaxim

2019-05-17 12:34:34
  • #4
No, you are definitely not an idiot; rather, you only know the customs of your bank, your employer, and you should - if you want to help independently and based on the market - make this clearer, because these customs, which I would call disclosure criteria, are so different that you cannot know them all - unless you are a financing broker.

Therefore, it does not have to be only the way it is with you, and it read like that; accordingly, I, as an independent broker and former Commerzbank employee, correct it so that the impression does not arise that it is only the way it is with you.
 

yellow_ms

2019-05-17 12:35:08
  • #5
We have not yet drawn on the [FK], as we had around 40% equity and the construction is only now really starting. Now we have the choice to use the remaining equity or first draw on [FK] to reduce the impending commitment interest. It fits perfectly, as we only pay loan interest for two months longer but can significantly reduce the commitment interest.
 

nordanney

2019-05-17 12:48:29
  • #6

We are a real bank - but also a refinancing partner of several hundred different banks. In ALL banks, the lending value is a constant figure because it is sustainable and should not change within the range of a few thousand euros in costs (which only becomes clear at the end of the construction project). If the customer has to build more expensively due to price increases, that does not change the lending value. Any knowledge of the BelWertV?

These are not our practices, but generally valid practices, because one cannot and must not simply override legal requirements.
 

Similar topics
04.11.2009Taking a loan for equity financing?19
28.03.2011Can we afford to build a house without equity?14
20.07.2011House construction: Equity / incidental construction costs realistic?14
03.04.2012Buying a house without equity?29
30.04.2012No equity, good income, financing feasible?22
26.08.2012Small single-family house, little equity but good income, is it at all feasible?11
14.11.2012KfW loan as equity capital - Who knows this financing?10
19.03.2013General questions about equity and construction costs10
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
20.06.2013Problems with equity - real estate purchase15
29.08.2013Calculate equity and financing12
27.02.2015Financing plan: high equity / 2.67% / 15 years / full repayment15
14.01.2014Different share/equity for construction. How to write it firmly?10
21.02.2015Impacts on loan when equity is in property17
18.02.2016Collateral value & equity11
10.01.2017Construction financing without equity capital, but with other liabilities36
23.01.2017Questions about the calculation of equity / assessment of incidental purchase costs11
15.07.2018House purchase - improve equity through installment loan?13
30.09.2020Is it possible to prefer external financing (retrospectively) over equity?16
12.04.2022Delay in building materials - extend provisioning interest11

Oben