The house itself was originally a single-family home and was converted into a two-family house. It was built in the 1950s and an extension was added in 1985. Which value do you use for the calculation? Is there a formula? For example, taking the average?
Yes, the expert report should describe both building parts and the respective building fabric. The remaining useful life will probably result in an overall value. Theoretically, you can also value both parts separately, but I don't think that makes sense.
Well, Dirk, for us it was a 7% discount because the plot with 750 sqm was significantly larger than the 300 sqm assumed as standard.
We are talking about land
benchmark values. In times when it is not unusual in many places to demand and actually pay double the land benchmark value without batting an eye, a 7% discount due to size is negligible. Although honestly, that sounds strange for you – if 300 sqm is standard, then there is usually no discount for 750 sqm. Such discounts are more common in regions where a plot averages over 1000 sqm.
At 230,000 EUR that our plot "costs," that would be 16,000 EUR. Whether one should disregard a well-equipped small car... well, I don't know.
I think you are confusing something there. Or your plot has local peculiarities that justify the discount related to your individual plot. You would have to look at it in detail, but in an area where the square meter costs about 300 EUR, a 750 sqm plot is simply a double plot. If fully buildable, that does not justify a discount.
And regarding the 60 euros, just look at what garden land is being asked for in metropolitan areas. But I don't have to tell you that.
Sure – but there the square meter of building land also doesn't cost 110 EUR.
If the sqm costs 300 euros, garden land for 60 euros is not unrealistic, so why shouldn't 20 euros fit with 100 euros?
For the reasons described before. In addition, you contradict yourself. In areas where the BRW is at 300 €/sqm, garden land is in demand and can – if you get 50–100 sqm garden land from the neighbor – also improve the buildability of your own 300 sqm, e.g. for an extension; so it has partly building land value, even if only conditionally.
In the present case, there is a plot with 700 sqm that is buildable and additionally 900 sqm that
does not improve the buildability of the 700 sqm area.
Last but not least: we are currently handling a case where the BRW is about 90 € and garden land is actually traded at about 10–20 €. That fits too, but that is locally a different situation than with the original poster.
Of course, you won't get garden land in the deepest Eifel for 50 euros if building land costs only 30 euros. But an expert should actually be able to manage that.
Again: if the garden land south of the 700 sqm still
had a value above the forestry/agricultural area, that would be visible in the BRW map. The map is created by the appraisal committee and updated annually. The red line together with the assessment that no further land benchmark zone was entered in the southern area of the line is the result of continuous professional evaluation.
If the southern 900 sqm area should be valued at +10 €, then the expert report should provide a
very good justification for that.
Best regards Dirk Grafe