Solar yield too low; how to adjust three flat collectors

  • Erstellt am 2012-10-28 14:25:51

Häuslebauer40

2012-11-12 15:41:29
  • #1
I do not agree with you in this case, construction expert.

The information from the Federal Health Office clearly states in this context, as reproduced here without omitting any lines or paragraphs:



In my, albeit lay, legal opinion, single- and two-family houses are therefore definitely exempt from the testing obligation regardless of the size of the storage tank.

If necessary, you should have this circumstance reviewed again by an administrative lawyer here, if not already done, in the interest of your clients who already have enough trouble in the present case.
 

Bauexperte

2012-11-12 16:03:35
  • #2
Hello,


You don’t have to – it doesn’t change anything about the circumstances, because


that will not be necessary, as the storage tank will be replaced with a smaller unit in the foreseeable future. If it were different, I would already be stirring up entire office towers

Kind regards
 

Häuslebauer40

2012-11-12 16:19:45
  • #3


Ok, then it's settled anyway

I was just surprised because I had only heard about it and actually I should be familiar with it since I also have a 500l water storage tank myself (although I do need it)
 

Micha&Dany

2012-11-12 17:39:38
  • #4


Only drinking water storage tanks or combination tanks for drinking water and heating??
 

Häuslebauer40

2012-11-12 18:25:19
  • #5


Since it is a total of 500 liters, I assume that it is a combination tank.
 

Micha&Dany

2012-11-13 08:50:01
  • #6


Hmm - Do you have solar thermal (ST) for heating support? Then the 500 liters are not your drinking water, but the drinking water is heated by the 500 liters. That means in this case the legionella in the storage tank are completely irrelevant – so nothing needs to be investigated. (Regardless of which one of you is right *g*)

Regards Micha
 
Oben