Single-family house - Right choice Poroton?

  • Erstellt am 2016-08-02 10:35:07

WildThing

2016-08-07 10:18:42
  • #1
Hello,

- the thing with the fastening is correct, you really need special plugs for that. (It's even worse with a prefabricated house with wooden studs)
- What do you mean by that? Very quickly very hot and then cold again? I can't confirm that... But these also come from an attic apartment with insulation from the 70s (So "no" insulation), we couldn't sleep there in the summer anymore, it was a sauna.
 

Goldi09111

2016-08-07 11:31:30
  • #2
I took a closer look at a 36.5' T7 MW a few days ago, there is enough material available for fastening. A larger T8 will, in my opinion, really make the situation lousy.
 

andimann

2016-08-07 21:52:31
  • #3
Evening



I always wonder where stuff like this comes from. Yes, with lightweight Poroton you need a few extra anchors if you really want to hang heavy things. In our current house, all walls are made of Poroton hollow bricks, the slightly heavier ones. There the regular anchors hold perfectly without any problems.

Mass? Have you ever calculated the wall weights? Roughly estimated, a 17.5 KS wall weighs about 260 kg/m^2, the 36 cm Poroton T9 wall weighs about 240 kg/m^2. Does that really make a big difference...
If you, of course, compare a 24 cm KS wall with a 24 cm Poroton wall, the comparison looks different. But with KS they always told me the big advantage was the thin wall thickness. Nobody wanted to build 24 cm there.

KS offers precisely the advantage that it is extremely compressive resistant, allowing thin walls. But you pay for that by giving up the option to hide sewage pipes, ventilation, etc. inside the wall. You then have them nicely boxed in front of your face while they would have been hidden inside the 24-36 cm Poroton wall.

Many greetings,

Andreas
 

toxicmolotof

2016-08-07 22:59:20
  • #4
He wants to build here with a 17.5 Poroton wall. So half as much mass as a 36.
 

robi782

2016-08-08 09:08:00
  • #5



Again! Wrong! I have said several times that I am not fixed on building like that if the construction company does it. You should stick to the facts if you want to report something!!
 

toxicmolotof

2016-08-08 09:50:53
  • #6
Boy, you simply didn't understand what my statement was about. In that respect, you missed the point.

Here, 17.5 Poroton should be compared with 17.5 KS and not 17.5 KS with 36 Poroton.

In that respect, it was not about you, but about Andreas, so that he doesn't misinterpret anything.

Build with whatever you want.
 

Similar topics
19.10.2010Poroton T14 or aerated concrete climate standard PP211
20.03.2015Poroton or Ytong - insulation values, etc.?20
25.02.2013Aerated concrete or Poroton or sand-lime brick?10
24.05.2016Poroton S9 or T9 experiences24
23.08.201317.5 Poroton + 16 WDVS or 36.5 Aerated concrete19
29.01.2014Kfw70 with poroton and utility water WP + gas + decentralized ventilation13
15.05.2016Poroton bricks filled or unfilled?18
04.03.2015Solid house: Which stone? Poroton, Liapor / expanded clay, Ytong?25
17.12.2015Is T8 Poroton only significantly better than T12 in heating costs?14
22.08.2019Poroton brick walls or Liapor walls FCN15
04.10.2017Poroton or lime sand stone43
04.10.2021Which developers build with POROTON in SH55
03.06.2018Thermal bricks / Poroton and insulated clinker - Is that optimal?21
22.07.2019Aerated concrete or Poroton for single-family house19
26.12.2019Poroton T12 stones exterior wall18
01.02.2021Poroton (36.5 cm) versus lightweight expanded clay aggregate solid wall (41 cm)74
14.02.2021Wall structure 36.5 Poroton T8 including clinker32
06.11.2021KfW55 EE house with 42.5 Poroton: planned too tight?16
22.08.2022Is insulation useful with Poroton bricks?19
25.09.2023Statics - house with basement due to insulation, shifting Poroton bricks11

Oben